I vote for #1 On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboe...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> ha, that's interesting - thanks for the pointer Deron, I wasn't expecting > this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this. > > Regards, > Matthias > > > On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote: > >> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the features of 3 >> and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others here since I have >> no training in design and the multitude of considerations involved such as >> scalability. >> >> I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of the ASF ( >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics), although I >> don't know how strict this is. >> >> Deron >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboe...@googlemail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer to remove the >>> TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project with no intentions >>> to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it too but it's >>> probably a different context, especially since there are discussions to >>> add >>> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-) >>> >>> Regards, >>> Matthias >>> >>> >>> On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote: >>> >>> +1 for 1 >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson < >>>> jer...@objectadjective.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 on option 1 as well. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo with name and >>>>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost with the other 3, >>>>> at >>>>> small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and isometric >>>>> versions. >>>>> They make a great family. >>>>> >>>>> ........................... >>>>> >>>>> Jeremy Anderson >>>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective >>>>> >>>>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <frre...@us.ibm.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Fred >>>>>> >>>>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 >>>>>> 11:19:01 >>>>>> AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1 because]Renee >>>>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!! thank you so >>>>>> much! >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun! >>>>>> >>>>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <renee.uxdes...@gmail.com> >>>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org >>>>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> love these!!! thank you so much! >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun! >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <rosypeng...@gmail.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png >>>>>> >>>>>>> google drive: >>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/ >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing >>>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/ >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hopefully one of these work. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Rose >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler <fschue...@posteo.de> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Rose, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I believe the attachment was removed - probably because of size >>>>>>>> limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share the link? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Felix >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we would love >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo that >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> conveys >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is inspired >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> by a >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> SystemML. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In the attached image, we have two main types of logo explorations. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> One >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show how they >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML". >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable parts to >>>>>>>>> communicate the customizability of algorithms that SystemML >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> provides, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> so >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have several >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> variations. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but we'd love >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> suggestions >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> that we can take into consideration. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> *Rose Peng* >>>>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology >>>>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> ---------------------------------------- >>>>>>> *Rose Peng* >>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology >>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>
