+1 to Morgan #1 can scale really well and #4 would make a great mascot. Thanks!
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Morgan Fritz <morganmfr...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for 1 and 4, > > 1 is great for a flat logo icon, for the top of the website, headers, etc. > that can be scaled very small (and large) > and > 4 is perfect for the interactions throughout the website, and other > animations, branding pieces, etc. > > We can definitely have a range of uses for iconography that can utilize > more than one design! > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Nakul Jindal <naku...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 for #1 - more professional and minimalist > > > > Second favorite is 3 or 4 - is more "fun" and conveys the idea of > SystemML > > being a "black box" and works well with the animation that Rose Peng > worked > > on. > > > > -Nakul > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Madison Myers <madisonjmy...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 for SystemML action figures as well :D > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Madison Myers < > madisonjmy...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 for what Mike said! I'd say 1 is my favorite and 4 is my second > > > > favorite. Would love to incorporate them all as suggested by Mike and > > > > Jeremy. > > > > > > > > These are really great, btw. Awesome work! > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Jeremy Anderson < > > > > jer...@objectadjective.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> +1 Mike. > > > >> > > > >> We're working on t-shirt designs, sticker designs, maybe buttons. > > Action > > > >> figures would be really cool! > > > >> > > > >> ........................... > > > >> > > > >> Jeremy Anderson > > > >> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective > > > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective > > > >> > > > >> On 21 October 2016 at 14:27, <dusenberr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > I like all of these options! I'll give a +1 for #1 as the main > > logo, > > > >> and > > > >> > I also think it would be great to make use of the rest of the > > designs > > > >> > throughout the website and other project materials. > > > >> > > > > >> > Thanks!! > > > >> > > > > >> > -Mike > > > >> > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > > > > >> > Mike Dusenberry > > > >> > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > > > >> > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > > >> > > > > >> > Sent from my iPhone. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > On Oct 21, 2016, at 1:01 PM, Niketan Pansare < > npan...@us.ibm.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > All the logos are awesome, thanks design team !! > > > >> > > > > > >> > > I vote for #4. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Niketan Pansare > > > >> > > IBM Almaden Research Center > > > >> > > E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com > > > >> > > http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person= > > > >> us-npansar > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Deron Eriksson ---10/21/2016 12:57:25 PM---Given the > overwhelming > > > >> > support for #1, I give my +1 to #1. Deron > > > >> > > > > > >> > > From: Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com> > > > >> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > > >> > > Date: 10/21/2016 12:57 PM > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Given the overwhelming support for #1, I give my +1 to #1. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Deron > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Jason Azares < > > > >> jason.aza...@gmail.com> > > > >> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I vote for #1 > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Boehm < > > > >> > mboe...@googlemail.com> > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > ha, that's interesting - thanks for the pointer Deron, I > > wasn't > > > >> > expecting > > > >> > > > > this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Regards, > > > >> > > > > Matthias > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > >> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the > > > >> > features of > > > >> > > > 3 > > > >> > > > >> and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others > here > > > >> since > > > >> > I > > > >> > > > have > > > >> > > > >> no training in design and the multitude of considerations > > > >> involved > > > >> > such > > > >> > > > as > > > >> > > > >> scalability. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of > > the > > > >> ASF ( > > > >> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics > ), > > > >> > although I > > > >> > > > >> don't know how strict this is. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Deron > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm < > > > >> > > > mboe...@googlemail.com> > > > >> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer > > to > > > >> > remove > > > >> > > > the > > > >> > > > >>> TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project > with > > no > > > >> > > > intentions > > > >> > > > >>> to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it > > too > > > >> but > > > >> > it's > > > >> > > > >>> probably a different context, especially since there are > > > >> > discussions to > > > >> > > > >>> add > > > >> > > > >>> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-) > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> Regards, > > > >> > > > >>> Matthias > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >>> +1 for 1 > > > >> > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson < > > > >> > > > >>>> jer...@objectadjective.com> > > > >> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > >>>> +1 on option 1 as well. > > > >> > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>> For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo > > > with > > > >> > name > > > >> > > > and > > > >> > > > >>>>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost > with > > > the > > > >> > other > > > >> > > > 3, > > > >> > > > >>>>> at > > > >> > > > >>>>> small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and > > > >> isometric > > > >> > > > >>>>> versions. > > > >> > > > >>>>> They make a great family. > > > >> > > > >>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>> ........................... > > > >> > > > >>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>> Jeremy Anderson > > > >> > > > >>>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective > > > >> > > > >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective > > > >> > > > >>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss < > > > >> > frre...@us.ibm.com> > > > >> > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself. > > > >> > > > >>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>> Fred > > > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas > > > >> ---10/21/2016 > > > >> > > > >>>>>> 11:19:01 > > > >> > > > >>>>>> AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1 > > > >> > because]Renee > > > >> > > > >>>>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!! > > thank > > > >> you > > > >> > so > > > >> > > > >>>>>> much! > > > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>> +1 > > > >> > > > >>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun! > > > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <renee.uxdes...@gmail.com> > > > >> > > > >>>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > > >> > > > >>>>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM > > > >> > > > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas > > > >> > > > >>>>>> ------------------------------ > > > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>> love these!!! thank you so much! > > > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun! > > > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng < > > > >> > rosypeng...@gmail.com> > > > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png > > > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> google drive: > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/ > > > >> d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/ > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file > > > >> /d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/ > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> Hopefully one of these work. > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks, > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> Rose > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler < > > > >> > > > fschue...@posteo.de> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> Hi Rose, > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> I believe the attachment was removed - probably > because > > > of > > > >> > size > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and > > share > > > >> the > > > >> > > > link? > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> Felix > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote: > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> Hi everyone, > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> The design team has explored a few logo concepts, > and > > we > > > >> > would > > > >> > > > love > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> to > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>> see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a > > logo > > > >> that > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> conveys > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile > is > > > >> > inspired > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> by a > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical > > background > > > of > > > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> SystemML. > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> In the attached image, we have two main types of logo > > > >> > > > explorations. > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> One > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>> is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an > > > >> isometric > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to > show > > > how > > > >> > they > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> would > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>> look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML". > > > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Ultimately, we want the robot to have > interchangeable > > > >> parts > > > >> > to > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> communicate the customizability of algorithms that > > > >> SystemML > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> provides, > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>> so > > > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have > > > >> several > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> variations. > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, > > but > > > >> we'd > > > >> > > > love > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> to > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make > > other > > > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> suggestions > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> that we can take into consideration. > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks! > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------- > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> *Rose Peng* > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>) > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> -- > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> ---------------------------------------- > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> *Rose Peng* > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com) > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>>> > > > >> > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > *Madison J. Myers* > > > > *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17* > > > > > > > > *King's College London, MA Political Science '14* > > > > *New York University, BA Political Science '12* > > > > > > > > - > > > > LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > *Madison J. Myers* > > > *UC Berkeley, Master of Information & Data Science '17* > > > > > > *King's College London, MA Political Science '14* > > > *New York University, BA Political Science '12* > > > > > > - > > > LinkedIn <http://linkedin.com/in/madisonjmyers> > > > > > >
