Given the overwhelming support for #1, I give my +1 to #1. Deron
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Jason Azares <jason.aza...@gmail.com> wrote: > I vote for #1 > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Matthias Boehm <mboe...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > > > ha, that's interesting - thanks for the pointer Deron, I wasn't expecting > > this at all. Somehow my eyes always ignored this. > > > > Regards, > > Matthias > > > > > > On 10/21/2016 9:22 PM, Deron Eriksson wrote: > > > >> I think they all look fantastic. My untrained eye likes the features of > 3 > >> and 4 but I completely defer to the judgements of others here since I > have > >> no training in design and the multitude of considerations involved such > as > >> scalability. > >> > >> I believe the logo trademark is an official requirement of the ASF ( > >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#graphics), although I > >> don't know how strict this is. > >> > >> Deron > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Matthias Boehm < > mboe...@googlemail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> Thanks for these proposals. For all the options, I'd prefer to remove > the > >>> TM - it's just a little odd for an open source project with no > intentions > >>> to register a trademark. I know, the new Spark logo has it too but it's > >>> probably a different context, especially since there are discussions to > >>> add > >>> SPARC support in Spark 2.1 ;-) > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Matthias > >>> > >>> > >>> On 10/21/2016 8:47 PM, Dexter Lesaca wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 for 1 > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:44 AM Jeremy Anderson < > >>>> jer...@objectadjective.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> +1 on option 1 as well. > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> For the 4 options, I think it's important that full logo with name > and > >>>>> mark, scales well. I'm concerned detail will get lost with the other > 3, > >>>>> at > >>>>> small sizes. I would love to use all of the simple and isometric > >>>>> versions. > >>>>> They make a great family. > >>>>> > >>>>> ........................... > >>>>> > >>>>> Jeremy Anderson > >>>>> https://twitter.com/ObjectAdjective > >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/objectadjective > >>>>> > >>>>> On 21 October 2016 at 11:27, Frederick R Reiss <frre...@us.ibm.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> These are awesome! I'm more a fan of option #4 myself. > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Fred > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [image: Inactive hide details for Renee Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 > >>>>>> 11:19:01 > >>>>>> AM---love these!!! thank you so much! +1 on option 1 because]Renee > >>>>>> Mascarinas ---10/21/2016 11:19:01 AM---love these!!! thank you so > >>>>>> much! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1 > >>>>> > >>>>> on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> From: Renee Mascarinas <renee.uxdes...@gmail.com> > >>>>>> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > >>>>>> Date: 10/21/2016 11:19 AM > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas > >>>>>> ------------------------------ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> love these!!! thank you so much! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1 on option 1 because it's both minimalistic and fun! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Rose Peng <rosypeng...@gmail.com> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> imgur: http://i.imgur.com/iuvOIDB.png > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> google drive: > >>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/ > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing > >>>>>>> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B70RXaqBkBoydnlZQUF3N3NUa2c/ > >>>>>>> view?usp=sharing> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hopefully one of these work. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> Rose > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Felix Schüler < > fschue...@posteo.de> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi Rose, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I believe the attachment was removed - probably because of size > >>>>>>>> limitations. Could you upload it somewhere else and share the > link? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Felix > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 20.10.2016 20:02, Rose Peng wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi everyone, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The design team has explored a few logo concepts, and we would > love > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> see which ideas you like the most! We're looking for a logo that > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> conveys > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> optimization, and we came up with a robot. The smile is inspired > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> by a > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> matrix bracket to bring to mind the mathematical background of > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> SystemML. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> In the attached image, we have two main types of logo > explorations. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> One > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> is a simple forward-facing robot and the other is an isometric > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> interpretation. Below that we pulled out a few to show how they > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> would > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> look as logos besides the words "Apache SystemML". > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Ultimately, we want the robot to have interchangeable parts to > >>>>>>>>> communicate the customizability of algorithms that SystemML > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> provides, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> so > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> whatever logo ends up being chosen it could still have several > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> variations. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Personally, we like concept #1 for the minimal look, but we'd > love > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> hear your thoughts. Feel free to mix and match or make other > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> suggestions > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> that we can take into consideration. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>> *Rose Peng* > >>>>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology > >>>>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com <http://www.rosepeng.com/>) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> ---------------------------------------- > >>>>>>> *Rose Peng* > >>>>>>> MS HCI 2015 - Georgia Institute of Technology > >>>>>>> (www.rosepeng.com) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> >
