Well, there are 10 annotations now in the "annot" package right now. I would not want to clutter the top level with too many things, unless we reduce the annotations to 2 or 3 it seems better to give them a separate place.
Werner On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > if we can just not use it it is better. annotation doesn't bring much > information IMHO. Otherwise to stay consistent we put a package > classes, another one interfaces, an enumerations etc... > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau > http://www.tomitribe.com > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2014-12-03 15:02 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > +1 for full names wherever possible and the norm. > > > > On Wed Dec 03 2014 at 8:54:58 AM Andres Almiray <aalmi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> +1 on "annotation" > >> > >> ------------------------------------------- > >> Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast > >> http://jroller.com/aalmiray > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray > >> -- > >> What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator. > >> There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, > and > >> those who don't. > >> To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion. > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Werner Keil <werner.k...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Looking not only at Java EE (http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/) > >> you'll > >> > find plenty of packages from "javax.annotation" to > >> > "javax.servlet.annotation", etc. > >> > > >> > I already raised this to Anatole before Tamaya, that > >> > "org.apache.tamaya.annot" should be called > "org.apache.tamaya.annotation" > >> , > >> > too. > >> > > >> > Anybody against that?;-) > >> > > >> > I could also create a JIRA ticket for that. > >> > > >> > Werner > >> > > >> >
