@romain: +1 we also dropped it in deltaspike, because annotations are a regular part of the language (you also >don't< create packages like "classes", "interfaces",...) using an own package for annotations was "modern" with java 5 (since they were provided as "secondary" part in the beginning).
regards, gerhard 2014-12-03 15:25 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <werner.k...@gmail.com>: > See DeviceMap that's an option, too. > > A whole lot of JSRs do provide dedicated "annotation" or "exception" > packages, but if we grouped it into some logical or semantic structure, why > not. > Probably best to sketch anything in that direction on the Wiki rather than > passing around names and structures;-) > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > we don't need to clutter anything, we need to split it as well (event, > > configuration, listener, ...we have several topics) > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > > > 2014-12-03 15:13 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <werner.k...@gmail.com>: > > > Well, there are 10 annotations now in the "annot" package right now. I > > > would not want to clutter the top level with too many things, unless we > > > reduce the annotations to 2 or 3 it seems better to give them a > separate > > > place. > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> if we can just not use it it is better. annotation doesn't bring much > > >> information IMHO. Otherwise to stay consistent we put a package > > >> classes, another one interfaces, an enumerations etc... > > >> > > >> > > >> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >> @rmannibucau > > >> http://www.tomitribe.com > > >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > > >> https://github.com/rmannibucau > > >> > > >> > > >> 2014-12-03 15:02 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > >> > +1 for full names wherever possible and the norm. > > >> > > > >> > On Wed Dec 03 2014 at 8:54:58 AM Andres Almiray <aalmi...@gmail.com > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> +1 on "annotation" > > >> >> > > >> >> ------------------------------------------- > > >> >> Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast > > >> >> http://jroller.com/aalmiray > > >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray > > >> >> -- > > >> >> What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator. > > >> >> There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand > > binary, > > >> and > > >> >> those who don't. > > >> >> To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion. > > >> >> > > >> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Werner Keil <werner.k...@gmail.com > > > > >> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> > Hi, > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Looking not only at Java EE ( > http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/) > > >> >> you'll > > >> >> > find plenty of packages from "javax.annotation" to > > >> >> > "javax.servlet.annotation", etc. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > I already raised this to Anatole before Tamaya, that > > >> >> > "org.apache.tamaya.annot" should be called > > >> "org.apache.tamaya.annotation" > > >> >> , > > >> >> > too. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Anybody against that?;-) > > >> >> > > > >> >> > I could also create a JIRA ticket for that. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Werner > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >
