Many Java standards do, but underlying CDI is an example where it was also done differently. Agorava another popular downstream user of CDI (and DeltaSpike to some extent) has a dedicated "exceptions" package, but also does not handle annotations separately.
Werner On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com > wrote: > @romain: +1 > we also dropped it in deltaspike, because annotations are a regular part of > the language (you also >don't< create packages like "classes", > "interfaces",...) > using an own package for annotations was "modern" with java 5 (since they > were provided as "secondary" part in the beginning). > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2014-12-03 15:25 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <werner.k...@gmail.com>: > > > See DeviceMap that's an option, too. > > > > A whole lot of JSRs do provide dedicated "annotation" or "exception" > > packages, but if we grouped it into some logical or semantic structure, > why > > not. > > Probably best to sketch anything in that direction on the Wiki rather > than > > passing around names and structures;-) > > > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > we don't need to clutter anything, we need to split it as well (event, > > > configuration, listener, ...we have several topics) > > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > @rmannibucau > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > > > > > > 2014-12-03 15:13 GMT+01:00 Werner Keil <werner.k...@gmail.com>: > > > > Well, there are 10 annotations now in the "annot" package right now. > I > > > > would not want to clutter the top level with too many things, unless > we > > > > reduce the annotations to 2 or 3 it seems better to give them a > > separate > > > > place. > > > > > > > > Werner > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> if we can just not use it it is better. annotation doesn't bring > much > > > >> information IMHO. Otherwise to stay consistent we put a package > > > >> classes, another one interfaces, an enumerations etc... > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Romain Manni-Bucau > > > >> @rmannibucau > > > >> http://www.tomitribe.com > > > >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > > > >> https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> 2014-12-03 15:02 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > > >> > +1 for full names wherever possible and the norm. > > > >> > > > > >> > On Wed Dec 03 2014 at 8:54:58 AM Andres Almiray < > aalmi...@gmail.com > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> >> +1 on "annotation" > > > >> >> > > > >> >> ------------------------------------------- > > > >> >> Java Champion; Groovy Enthusiast > > > >> >> http://jroller.com/aalmiray > > > >> >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/aalmiray > > > >> >> -- > > > >> >> What goes up, must come down. Ask any system administrator. > > > >> >> There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand > > > binary, > > > >> and > > > >> >> those who don't. > > > >> >> To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Werner Keil < > werner.k...@gmail.com > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Hi, > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > Looking not only at Java EE ( > > http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/) > > > >> >> you'll > > > >> >> > find plenty of packages from "javax.annotation" to > > > >> >> > "javax.servlet.annotation", etc. > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > I already raised this to Anatole before Tamaya, that > > > >> >> > "org.apache.tamaya.annot" should be called > > > >> "org.apache.tamaya.annotation" > > > >> >> , > > > >> >> > too. > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > Anybody against that?;-) > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > I could also create a JIRA ticket for that. > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > Werner > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > >
