The 2nd sentence was meant to say It may not matter so much to core, but it should to those modules that deal with external systems like configuration sources...
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Seems out of scope for me. If you want partnerships tons of other projects >> would make more sense to me but we should stop adding things around while >> we didnt release anything. Just makes the core weaker than we need. Let >> stabilize, release and add...otherwise value of tamaya would be in >> extensions then tamaya would IMO be a failure. >> Le 8 mars 2015 09:19, "Oliver B. Fischer" <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >> >> > Hi Werner, >> > >> > I will have a look at it today... >> > >> > Am 07.03.15 um 11:10 schrieb Werner Keil: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Have any of you heard about or looked at Apache Brooklyn, also >> incubating >> >> right now: >> >> https://brooklyn.incubator.apache.org/ >> >> >> >> Especially on the Java side (it supports other languages, too) a >> "Brooklyn >> >> Bridge" for Tamaya could be beneficial to both. Given there are many >> >> configuration aspects to Brooklyn, especially for defining and applying >> >> configurations it looks promising and interesting. >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> >> Werner >> >> >> >> >> > -- >> > N Oliver B. Fischer >> > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany >> > P +49 30 44793251 >> > M +49 178 7903538 >> > E [email protected] >> > S oliver.b.fischer >> > J [email protected] >> > X http://xing.to/obf >> > >> > >> > >
