For me it stays not related at all. Tamaya is too young to target anything. We need a gui and a mgt solution before targetting it Le 8 mars 2015 17:09, "Werner Keil" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> The 2nd sentence was meant to say > It may not matter so much to core, but it should to those modules that deal > with external systems like configuration sources... > > > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Seems out of scope for me. If you want partnerships tons of other > projects > >> would make more sense to me but we should stop adding things around > while > >> we didnt release anything. Just makes the core weaker than we need. Let > >> stabilize, release and add...otherwise value of tamaya would be in > >> extensions then tamaya would IMO be a failure. > >> Le 8 mars 2015 09:19, "Oliver B. Fischer" <[email protected]> a > >> écrit : > >> > >> > Hi Werner, > >> > > >> > I will have a look at it today... > >> > > >> > Am 07.03.15 um 11:10 schrieb Werner Keil: > >> > > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> Have any of you heard about or looked at Apache Brooklyn, also > >> incubating > >> >> right now: > >> >> https://brooklyn.incubator.apache.org/ > >> >> > >> >> Especially on the Java side (it supports other languages, too) a > >> "Brooklyn > >> >> Bridge" for Tamaya could be beneficial to both. Given there are many > >> >> configuration aspects to Brooklyn, especially for defining and > applying > >> >> configurations it looks promising and interesting. > >> >> > >> >> Cheers, > >> >> > >> >> Werner > >> >> > >> >> > >> > -- > >> > N Oliver B. Fischer > >> > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > >> > P +49 30 44793251 > >> > M +49 178 7903538 > >> > E [email protected] > >> > S oliver.b.fischer > >> > J [email protected] > >> > X http://xing.to/obf > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
