Let s vote..but once again tamaya is nthg today cause not on central Le 8 mars 2015 17:22, "Werner Keil" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Tamaya would not target Brooklyn at all, if so it'll be the opposite way. > Brooklyn defines and models stuff and Tamaya IMHO doesn't need tools or GUI > of its own (at most some sort of "Management console" like you find in > commercial EE products or Tomcat on a smaller scale, too;-) > If modeling and definition can be done by other solutions that's exactly > what we need: Upstream support. > > Werner Keil | JCP Executive Committee Member, JSR 363 Co Spec Lead | > Eclipse UOMo Lead, Babel Language Champion | Apache Committer | Advisory > Board Member, Java Track Chair, DWX '15 > > Twitter @wernerkeil | @UnitAPI | @JSR377 | @JSR354 | @AgoravaProj | > #EclipseUOMo > | #DeviceMap | #DevOps > Skype werner.keil | Google+ gplus.to/wernerkeil > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > For me it stays not related at all. Tamaya is too young to target > anything. > > We need a gui and a mgt solution before targetting it > > Le 8 mars 2015 17:09, "Werner Keil" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > The 2nd sentence was meant to say > > > It may not matter so much to core, but it should to those modules that > > deal > > > with external systems like configuration sources... > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Seems out of scope for me. If you want partnerships tons of other > > > projects > > > >> would make more sense to me but we should stop adding things around > > > while > > > >> we didnt release anything. Just makes the core weaker than we need. > > Let > > > >> stabilize, release and add...otherwise value of tamaya would be in > > > >> extensions then tamaya would IMO be a failure. > > > >> Le 8 mars 2015 09:19, "Oliver B. Fischer" < > [email protected]> > > a > > > >> écrit : > > > >> > > > >> > Hi Werner, > > > >> > > > > >> > I will have a look at it today... > > > >> > > > > >> > Am 07.03.15 um 11:10 schrieb Werner Keil: > > > >> > > > > >> >> Hi, > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Have any of you heard about or looked at Apache Brooklyn, also > > > >> incubating > > > >> >> right now: > > > >> >> https://brooklyn.incubator.apache.org/ > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Especially on the Java side (it supports other languages, too) a > > > >> "Brooklyn > > > >> >> Bridge" for Tamaya could be beneficial to both. Given there are > > many > > > >> >> configuration aspects to Brooklyn, especially for defining and > > > applying > > > >> >> configurations it looks promising and interesting. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Cheers, > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Werner > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > -- > > > >> > N Oliver B. Fischer > > > >> > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany > > > >> > P +49 30 44793251 > > > >> > M +49 178 7903538 > > > >> > E [email protected] > > > >> > S oliver.b.fischer > > > >> > J [email protected] > > > >> > X http://xing.to/obf > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
