I'd be more cautious. Some of the open issues contain good ideas that simply lack an interested committer. I agree that most should be closed, but a blind bulk action seems unwise. On Dec 17, 2012 1:20 PM, "Howard Lewis Ship" <hls...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > I think we can get away with this approach ; so much it no longer relevant > in 5.4. > > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Massimo Lusetti <mluse...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Ulrich Stärk <u...@spielviel.de> wrote: > > > > > > > I am inclined to bulk close these with a message that the reporter is > > free > > > to check if the issue > > > still persists with a more recent version of the framework. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > > I do agree, totally. Plus thanks for taking care. > > > > -- > > Massimo > > > > > > -- > Howard M. Lewis Ship > > Creator of Apache Tapestry > > The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to > learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! > > (971) 678-5210 > http://howardlewisship.com >
