They are discussed in the thread I've linked to.

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Ulrich Stärk <[email protected]> wrote:

> Can we please document the technical changes?
>
> On 07.02.2013 09:33, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> > Recent discussions lead up to rise again an old issue in Tapestry list:
> How
> > the framework handle requests to non existing URL.
> >
> > Now the framework simply treat them as activation context even if the
> pages
> > does not have a activation context event handler method.
> >
> > Here is a request of vote to change this behavior in having the framework
> > return a 404 error when the pages does not have a event handler method
> and
> > the request comes with an activation context.
> >
> > Our latest discussion is here for you to read:
> >
> http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/How-to-handle-404-nicely-TAP5-879-td5719588.html
> >
> >
> > Massimo Lusetti: +1 (binding)
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>


-- 
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com

Reply via email to