Massimo, I encourage you take a crack at implementing speculative support for this as you see it. Until we have a concrete implementation, we are talking in circles. If we voted on everything one might or might not do, we'd never never get anywhere. As I mentioned in the other thread, I don't think Steve Eyron's proposal is sufficient.
Kalle On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:33 AM, Massimo Lusetti <[email protected]> wrote: > Recent discussions lead up to rise again an old issue in Tapestry list: How > the framework handle requests to non existing URL. > > Now the framework simply treat them as activation context even if the pages > does not have a activation context event handler method. > > Here is a request of vote to change this behavior in having the framework > return a 404 error when the pages does not have a event handler method and > the request comes with an activation context. > > Our latest discussion is here for you to read: > > http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/How-to-handle-404-nicely-TAP5-879-td5719588.html > > > Massimo Lusetti: +1 (binding) > > -- > Massimo >
