On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:54:33 -0200, Kalle Korhonen
<[email protected]> wrote:
Massimo, I encourage you take a crack at implementing speculative support
for this as you see it. Until we have a concrete implementation, we are
talking in circles. If we voted on everything one might or might not do,
we'd never never get anywhere. As I mentioned in the other thread, I
don't think Steve Eyron's proposal is sufficient.
If you're talking about the annotations, I think that's something that
doesn't need a vote, as just implementing them won't change the existing
behavior of Tapestry applications. On the other hand, Steve's proposal
does change, so I think it needs a vote and it'll get a +1 from me.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
