Touche. I can live with byte as a special case :-).
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Konrad Grochowski <[email protected]> wrote: > There's no i8 but byte, which creates inconsistency ;) > > -------- Oryginalna wiadomość -------- > Od: Randy Abernethy <[email protected]> > Data:01.12.2014 14:21 (GMT+01:00) > Do: [email protected] > Temat: Re: i32 vs int > > One of the things I love about Thrift is its simple IDL. No aliases > just simple self describing types (i8, i16, etc). We presently have > one keyword for each feature of the IDL. I think the Pandora's box > analogy is a good one. It is hard work keeping things simple. > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Stig Bakken <[email protected]> wrote: >> Out of curiosity, what kinds of errors did you see from this? >> >> - Stig >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Jens Geyer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi *, >>> >>> I have found people multiple times doing things like this, ending up with >>> strange errors. >>> >>> typedef i32 int >>> >>> What about making it legal and allowing int as an built-in alias for i32? >>> Or should we add some kind of warning instead? >>> >>> Or would either one of these just open pandora’s box? >>> >>> Have fun, >>> JensG
