[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14965660#comment-14965660
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-3393:
----------------------------------------

Github user Jens-G commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/656#discussion_r42545542
  
    --- Diff: test/ThriftTest.thrift ---
    @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct Xtruct
     
     struct Xtruct2
     {
    -  1: byte   byte_thing,
    +  1: i8     byte_thing,  // used to be byte, hence the name
    --- End diff --
    
    Agree, but one of my goals was to break it down into small changes to 
prevent us from ending up with a monster patch. This could be one of the next 
steps.


> Introduce i8 to provide consistent set of Thrift IDL integer types
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-3393
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3393
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Compiler (General)
>            Reporter: Jens Geyer
>            Assignee: Jens Geyer
>              Labels: i8
>
> In following up a [recent email 
> discussion|https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/thrift-dev/201412.mbox/%3cdub110-ds46454ddd3a90974be62d69b1...@phx.gbl%3e]
>  and the consistent stream of problems with the [signedness of the Thrift IDL 
>  {{byte}} datatype|https://thrift.apache.org/docs/types], we should 
> * add an {{i8}} data type to provide a consistent set
> * keep the {{byte}} type for the sake of compatibility
> * internally map all references to {{byte}} to {{i8}}
> I'm hesitant though about printing a warning for {{byte}} at this stage. A 
> lot of third-party-tools rely on Thrift IDL and I don't want to introduce any 
> breaking changes. IMHO we should promote i8 instead of byte wherever 
> possible, but not hammer that nail too much.
> This patch is solely about the changes needed in the IDL and the compiler 
> infrastructure, changing only what's necessary in the various target 
> languages to let {{make check}} succeed. Any additional changes to be made in 
> the language libs should be added as a sub-task as necessary. This procedure 
> allows us to make the changes in a more granular way while still maintaining 
> a shippable product.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to