Hi Gavin,
The change we'd really like to make for Tika is to have two build
commands:
mvn clean install
mvn site
as this works around a known bug in Maven's handling of dependencies
with the 'site' target.
Don't know if buildbot supports that, but if so that would be most
useful.
Thanks,
-- Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 13 July 2010 7:01 PM
To: bui...@apache.org
Cc: dev@tika.apache.org
Subject: Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tika-trunk
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:35 PM, <build...@apache.org> wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of tika-trunk on ASF
Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tika-trunk/builds/49
Gavin, I assume you set up the Tika build on buildbot?
Yep, I don’t remember if someone asked for it or if it was one I
chose for testing buildbot with.
Can you change
the build command from "mvn clean install site" to just "mvn clean
install", or disable the failure notifications to d...@tika?
Well, disabling notifications would go against the point of having
builds
in the first place.
I have removed 'site' arg and committed.
fwiw any project is welcome to alter their own buildbot config file
if they
wish - or just ask me as you have done here.
Anyway, should all be good now.
For future, let me know please if you think it helpful that Tika
builds
continue
on Buildbot - with any improvements of extra steps/features you want
covering,
or if you don’t see any point and would like it removed. It matters
not to
me
whether a project uses Buildbot + Hudson + Continuum + Gump or any
combo of.
Buildbot has plenty of room, is stable and just works, but up to you
guys.
Thanks
Gav...
BR,
Jukka Zitting
--------------------------------------------
Ken Krugler
+1 530-210-6378
http://bixolabs.com
e l a s t i c w e b m i n i n g
