On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Yah I agree with Jukka here, but don't worry too much Mike if you're verbose > (or > anyone else for that matter). The RM (aka "moi" ;) ) always can take a look > at CHANGES.txt at the end of a release cycle (speaking of which, 1.0, > ApacheCon, > 1.0, ApacheCon ;) ) and distill the information to a manageable small amount. Thanks Chris :) I'm fine w/ not adding CHANGES entries on commit, if that's what we decide here; I just see some strong advantages to update-as-you-go (and I guess old habits die hard too!). Looking forward to one-dot-oh! Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com
