Hi Chris, I think the main issue with cutting a 1.0 release is whether we think the APIs are close enough.
From what I remember on the previous thread, the only open issue there was getting rid of deprecated stuff. Jukka had written: > It sounds like we have consensus to get rid of the deprecated stuff > before 1.0. I don't think a separate 0.9.9 or 0.10 release for that is > really needed, but it would be good to create a 0.x branch right > before the backwards-incompatible changes so people who have trouble > with the upgrade still have something more recent than 0.9 to work > with. So I don't think this impacts the timing, but maybe the process? -- Ken On Oct 26, 2011, at 3:16am, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hey Guys, > > I created a 1.1 version in JIRA and pushed all open (~13) issues for 1.0 to > 1.1. > > We now have 32 issues resolved in the current 1.0. WDYT? Good enough > for a 1.0 release? I'm happy to spin the RC tonight or in the next day (PDT). > > Any objections? > > Cheers, > Chris > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > -------------------------- Ken Krugler +1 530-210-6378 http://bixolabs.com custom big data solutions & training Hadoop, Cascading, Mahout & Solr
