I'd think from a TinkerPop branding perspective, it probably helps to have the name in there. It's Apache TinkerPop, not Apache Gremlin.
I just took a quick look on a mirror, and some other Apache projects (Spark, Kafka, HBase, NiFi, Pig, Zookeeper) don't even include apache in their distributables, so maybe we can just do: tinkerpop-gremlin-console-x.y.z.zip tinkerpop-gremlin-server-x.y.z.zip On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:03 AM Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: > jason i think that was a suggestion to conform more to standard apache > releases from someone in incubator. if it was mandatory we would have > burned for that too many times to count at this point. i'm good to change > it if everyone else is. what do we want them to be? > > apache-tinkerpop-console-x.y.z.zip > apache-tinkerpop-server-x.y.z.zip > > or the full business: > > apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-x.y.z.zip > apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-x.y.z.zip > > i guess we lost "-incubating" now so the latter doesn't look so bad to me > anymore. > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Yes, an imminent release is good. There are 2 severe bug fixes in master/ > > (3.2.1) that I would like to get out there. 3.2.0 had lots of internal > > changes to OLAP and I paid the price by incurring bugs. :| > > > > > Somebody had mentioned that our distributables are supposed to be named > > > apache-tinkerpop*.zip instead of apache-gremlin*.zip. Maybe that's > > > something that should be done along with this release. > > > > There is really no such thing as "tinkerpop" besides the source code > which > > is distributed as apache-tinkerpop-*.zip. The two other distributions are > > gremlin-console and gremlin-server and I think we should keep those > naming > > conventions as they are so they reflect what is being distributed. Thus, > I > > think the naming of our artifacts is correct. > > > > Thanks, > > Marko. > > > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > > On May 25, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Jason Plurad <plur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Somebody had mentioned that our distributables are supposed to be named > > > apache-tinkerpop*.zip instead of apache-gremlin*.zip. Maybe that's > > > something that should be done along with this release. > > > > > > -- Jason > > > > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Stephen Mallette < > spmalle...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> cool, Ted. it would be good to have another hand there. > > >> > > >> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >> > > >>> I think a release sounds good. I'd be interested in witnessing the > the > > >>> post-PMC vote release steps so that I might be able to help out on an > > >>> upcoming release. > > >>> > > >>> --Ted > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Marvin Froeder <velo...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Your are right, for some reason I though it was on the artifactId as > > >> well > > >>>> > > >>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Stephen Mallette < > > >> spmalle...@gmail.com > > >>>> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> I don't think we need to relocate anything. The "-incubating" is > just > > >>> in > > >>>>> the version name, so we will just remove it for future releases. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Jean-Baptiste Musso < > > >>> jbmu...@gmail.com> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> I think this is a good idea. This could make these releases look > > >> more > > >>>>>> "stable": I've often felt that the -incubating suffix somehow made > > >>>>>> releases look "alpha-ish" / "beta-ish", even though they were not. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Naming aside, bug fixes never hurt. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Jean-Baptiste > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Stephen Mallette < > > >>>> spmalle...@gmail.com > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> We've seen a lot of good fixes/optimizations to 3.1.3 and 3.2.1 > > >>> and I > > >>>>>>> wonder if we shouldn't exercise our new found TLP powers to do a > > >>>>> release > > >>>>>>> and get rid of the "-incubating" at the end of our "current" > > >>>>>> distributions > > >>>>>>> and artifacts. thoughts? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > >
