Thanks for the update Ted. We may need an extra day or two to clear up some other discussion on some of the other PRs - i don't think we can start a code freeze on Monday as I'd proposed.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Ted Wilmes <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > I had some time this week and made further progress on 1254. Still working > out some kinks but I'll see how far I can get over the weekend. Have a > good 4th. > > --Ted > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Marko Rodriguez <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Ted — I think we should get that work into the next release. Thus, if you > > need more time (reasonable amount), then I say we delay accordingly. > > > > NOTE: The Gremlin-Python stuff will not get into the next release. It has > > gotten really complex/powerful and is currently 100+ commits ahead of > > master/ ! :) .. As such, given the gargantuan undertaking, we will save > > this work for a future release. > > > > Thanks, > > Marko. > > > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > > > > > > > On Jun 28, 2016, at 10:36 AM, Ted Wilmes <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I would like to get TinkerPop-1254 in before code freeze. Shooting for > > > finishing it up by end of this week but I'll drop a note if it looks > > like I > > > won't make it. > > > > > > --Ted > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Stephen Mallette < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> It's end of June - time to start firming up for release. We have a > > number > > >> of outstanding PRs that need votes/merge. Perhaps we try to get those > > all > > >> in this week and begin code freeze next Monday (7/4)? > > >> > > >> I think we'll have to postpone the GLV work with gremlin-python for > this > > >> release. There's just too much left to do to get that in "right". Are > > there > > >> any other open issues of importance? > > >> > > >> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Marko Rodriguez <[email protected] > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Yes, end of June-ish is best for me as I have few things on my plate > > the > > >>> first half of this month. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> Marko. > > >>> > > >>> http://markorodriguez.com > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> On Jun 6, 2016, at 4:46 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> We didn't really discuss a date for release on this thread. I was > > >>> thinking > > >>>> that we could start looking at the week of July 4th as the target > week > > >>> for > > >>>> VOTE and nail down a date as we get closer. > > >>>> > > >>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Jason Plurad <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> I'd think from a TinkerPop branding perspective, it probably helps > to > > >>> have > > >>>>> the name in there. It's Apache TinkerPop, not Apache Gremlin. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I just took a quick look on a mirror, and some other Apache > projects > > >>>>> (Spark, Kafka, HBase, NiFi, Pig, Zookeeper) don't even include > apache > > >> in > > >>>>> their distributables, so maybe we can just do: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> tinkerpop-gremlin-console-x.y.z.zip > > >>>>> tinkerpop-gremlin-server-x.y.z.zip > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:03 AM Stephen Mallette < > > >> [email protected] > > >>>> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> jason i think that was a suggestion to conform more to standard > > >> apache > > >>>>>> releases from someone in incubator. if it was mandatory we would > > have > > >>>>>> burned for that too many times to count at this point. i'm good to > > >>> change > > >>>>>> it if everyone else is. what do we want them to be? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> apache-tinkerpop-console-x.y.z.zip > > >>>>>> apache-tinkerpop-server-x.y.z.zip > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> or the full business: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-x.y.z.zip > > >>>>>> apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-x.y.z.zip > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> i guess we lost "-incubating" now so the latter doesn't look so > bad > > >> to > > >>> me > > >>>>>> anymore. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Marko Rodriguez < > > >>> [email protected]> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Yes, an imminent release is good. There are 2 severe bug fixes in > > >>>>> master/ > > >>>>>>> (3.2.1) that I would like to get out there. 3.2.0 had lots of > > >> internal > > >>>>>>> changes to OLAP and I paid the price by incurring bugs. :| > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Somebody had mentioned that our distributables are supposed to > be > > >>>>> named > > >>>>>>>> apache-tinkerpop*.zip instead of apache-gremlin*.zip. Maybe > that's > > >>>>>>>> something that should be done along with this release. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> There is really no such thing as "tinkerpop" besides the source > > code > > >>>>>> which > > >>>>>>> is distributed as apache-tinkerpop-*.zip. The two other > > >> distributions > > >>>>> are > > >>>>>>> gremlin-console and gremlin-server and I think we should keep > those > > >>>>>> naming > > >>>>>>> conventions as they are so they reflect what is being > distributed. > > >>>>> Thus, > > >>>>>> I > > >>>>>>> think the naming of our artifacts is correct. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>> Marko. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> http://markorodriguez.com > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On May 25, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Jason Plurad <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Somebody had mentioned that our distributables are supposed to > be > > >>>>> named > > >>>>>>>> apache-tinkerpop*.zip instead of apache-gremlin*.zip. Maybe > that's > > >>>>>>>> something that should be done along with this release. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> -- Jason > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Stephen Mallette < > > >>>>>> [email protected]> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> cool, Ted. it would be good to have another hand there. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Ted Wilmes <[email protected] > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> I think a release sounds good. I'd be interested in > witnessing > > >> the > > >>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>> post-PMC vote release steps so that I might be able to help > out > > >> on > > >>>>> an > > >>>>>>>>>> upcoming release. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> --Ted > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Marvin Froeder < > > >> [email protected] > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Your are right, for some reason I though it was on the > > >> artifactId > > >>>>> as > > >>>>>>>>> well > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Stephen Mallette < > > >>>>>>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think we need to relocate anything. The > "-incubating" > > >> is > > >>>>>> just > > >>>>>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the version name, so we will just remove it for future > > >> releases. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Jean-Baptiste Musso < > > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think this is a good idea. This could make these releases > > >> look > > >>>>>>>>> more > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "stable": I've often felt that the -incubating suffix > somehow > > >>>>> made > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> releases look "alpha-ish" / "beta-ish", even though they > were > > >>>>> not. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Naming aside, bug fixes never hurt. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Stephen Mallette < > > >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We've seen a lot of good fixes/optimizations to 3.1.3 and > > >> 3.2.1 > > >>>>>>>>>> and I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wonder if we shouldn't exercise our new found TLP powers > to > > >> do > > >>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>>>>> release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and get rid of the "-incubating" at the end of our > "current" > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> distributions > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and artifacts. thoughts? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > >
