I would like to get TinkerPop-1254 in before code freeze. Shooting for finishing it up by end of this week but I'll drop a note if it looks like I won't make it.
--Ted On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's end of June - time to start firming up for release. We have a number > of outstanding PRs that need votes/merge. Perhaps we try to get those all > in this week and begin code freeze next Monday (7/4)? > > I think we'll have to postpone the GLV work with gremlin-python for this > release. There's just too much left to do to get that in "right". Are there > any other open issues of importance? > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Yes, end of June-ish is best for me as I have few things on my plate the > > first half of this month. > > > > Thanks, > > Marko. > > > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > > > > > On Jun 6, 2016, at 4:46 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > We didn't really discuss a date for release on this thread. I was > > thinking > > > that we could start looking at the week of July 4th as the target week > > for > > > VOTE and nail down a date as we get closer. > > > > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Jason Plurad <plur...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> I'd think from a TinkerPop branding perspective, it probably helps to > > have > > >> the name in there. It's Apache TinkerPop, not Apache Gremlin. > > >> > > >> I just took a quick look on a mirror, and some other Apache projects > > >> (Spark, Kafka, HBase, NiFi, Pig, Zookeeper) don't even include apache > in > > >> their distributables, so maybe we can just do: > > >> > > >> tinkerpop-gremlin-console-x.y.z.zip > > >> tinkerpop-gremlin-server-x.y.z.zip > > >> > > >> > > >> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:03 AM Stephen Mallette < > spmalle...@gmail.com > > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> jason i think that was a suggestion to conform more to standard > apache > > >>> releases from someone in incubator. if it was mandatory we would have > > >>> burned for that too many times to count at this point. i'm good to > > change > > >>> it if everyone else is. what do we want them to be? > > >>> > > >>> apache-tinkerpop-console-x.y.z.zip > > >>> apache-tinkerpop-server-x.y.z.zip > > >>> > > >>> or the full business: > > >>> > > >>> apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-x.y.z.zip > > >>> apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-x.y.z.zip > > >>> > > >>> i guess we lost "-incubating" now so the latter doesn't look so bad > to > > me > > >>> anymore. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Marko Rodriguez < > > okramma...@gmail.com> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Hi, > > >>>> > > >>>> Yes, an imminent release is good. There are 2 severe bug fixes in > > >> master/ > > >>>> (3.2.1) that I would like to get out there. 3.2.0 had lots of > internal > > >>>> changes to OLAP and I paid the price by incurring bugs. :| > > >>>> > > >>>>> Somebody had mentioned that our distributables are supposed to be > > >> named > > >>>>> apache-tinkerpop*.zip instead of apache-gremlin*.zip. Maybe that's > > >>>>> something that should be done along with this release. > > >>>> > > >>>> There is really no such thing as "tinkerpop" besides the source code > > >>> which > > >>>> is distributed as apache-tinkerpop-*.zip. The two other > distributions > > >> are > > >>>> gremlin-console and gremlin-server and I think we should keep those > > >>> naming > > >>>> conventions as they are so they reflect what is being distributed. > > >> Thus, > > >>> I > > >>>> think the naming of our artifacts is correct. > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks, > > >>>> Marko. > > >>>> > > >>>> http://markorodriguez.com > > >>>> > > >>>> On May 25, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Jason Plurad <plur...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Somebody had mentioned that our distributables are supposed to be > > >> named > > >>>>> apache-tinkerpop*.zip instead of apache-gremlin*.zip. Maybe that's > > >>>>> something that should be done along with this release. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- Jason > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Stephen Mallette < > > >>> spmalle...@gmail.com> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> cool, Ted. it would be good to have another hand there. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I think a release sounds good. I'd be interested in witnessing > the > > >>> the > > >>>>>>> post-PMC vote release steps so that I might be able to help out > on > > >> an > > >>>>>>> upcoming release. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> --Ted > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Marvin Froeder < > velo...@gmail.com > > >>> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Your are right, for some reason I though it was on the > artifactId > > >> as > > >>>>>> well > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Stephen Mallette < > > >>>>>> spmalle...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I don't think we need to relocate anything. The "-incubating" > is > > >>> just > > >>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>> the version name, so we will just remove it for future > releases. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Jean-Baptiste Musso < > > >>>>>>> jbmu...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> I think this is a good idea. This could make these releases > look > > >>>>>> more > > >>>>>>>>>> "stable": I've often felt that the -incubating suffix somehow > > >> made > > >>>>>>>>>> releases look "alpha-ish" / "beta-ish", even though they were > > >> not. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Naming aside, bug fixes never hurt. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Stephen Mallette < > > >>>>>>>> spmalle...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> We've seen a lot of good fixes/optimizations to 3.1.3 and > 3.2.1 > > >>>>>>> and I > > >>>>>>>>>>> wonder if we shouldn't exercise our new found TLP powers to > do > > >> a > > >>>>>>>>> release > > >>>>>>>>>>> and get rid of the "-incubating" at the end of our "current" > > >>>>>>>>>> distributions > > >>>>>>>>>>> and artifacts. thoughts? > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > >
