Yes - thanks for that reminder - i will do that too. On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 7:25 AM, Robert Dale <[email protected]> wrote:
> Stephen, did you see the other pull request to fix the 'option' section? > It would be great if you could pull that in if you are also rebuilding the > docs. > > On Wednesday, September 7, 2016, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > This VOTE is cancelled - we have to scrap this build. Weak. > > > > Kuppitz has a bug fix under test right now. On top of his fix, I will > > officially correct the "bad link" to GLVs that Robert found (thanks for > > reviewing/voting btw). Expect a new VOTE thread later today once this is > > all settled. > > > > Note that 3.1.4 did not have this problem so that VOTE can stay open - i > > just tested that out to be sure: > > > > gremlin> g.V(ids).as("a"). > > gremlin> > > repeat(bothE().otherV().simplePath()).times(5).emit( > > hasId(within(ids))).as("b"). > > gremlin> filter(select(last,"a","b").by(id).where("a", lt("b"))). > > gremlin> path().by().by(label) > > ==>[v[2], knows, v[1], knows, v[4]] > > ==>[v[2], knows, v[1], created, v[3], created, v[4]] > > ==>[v[2], knows, v[1], created, v[3], created, v[6]] > > ==>[v[2], knows, v[1], knows, v[4], created, v[3], created, v[6]] > > ==>[v[4], created, v[3], created, v[6]] > > ==>[v[4], knows, v[1], created, v[3], created, v[6]] > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected] > > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > Kuppitz saw a problem in one of the recipes - note the second example: > > > > > > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.2/recipes/ > > > > > > no results and this was working in 3.2.1: > > > > > > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.1/recipes/ > > > > > > His gremlin session shows: > > > > > > gremlin> g.V().hasId(1) > > > ==>v[1] > > > gremlin> g.V().hasId(within(1,2)) > > > gremlin> > > > > > > so damn - i guess we need to scrap this release and fix that problem - > i > > > guess i'm -1 based on that..........anyone have a clue as to what > changed > > > to cause that problem? > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Daniel Kuppitz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > >> Validation looks good: > > >> > > >> $ bin/validate-distribution.sh 3.2.2 > > >> > > >> Validating binary distributions > > >> > > >> * downloading Apache TinkerPop Gremlin > > >> (apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.2.2-bin.zip)... OK > > >> * validating signatures and checksums ... > > >> * PGP signature ... OK > > >> * MD5 checksum ... OK > > >> * SHA1 checksum ... OK > > >> * unzipping Apache TinkerPop Gremlin ... OK > > >> * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's docs ... OK > > >> * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's binaries ... OK > > >> * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's legal files ... > > >> * LICENSE ... OK > > >> * NOTICE ... OK > > >> * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's plugin directory ... OK > > >> * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's lib directory ... OK > > >> * testing script evaluation ... OK > > >> > > >> * downloading Apache TinkerPop Gremlin > > >> (apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-3.2.2-bin.zip)... OK > > >> * validating signatures and checksums ... > > >> * PGP signature ... OK > > >> * MD5 checksum ... OK > > >> * SHA1 checksum ... OK > > >> * unzipping Apache TinkerPop Gremlin ... OK > > >> * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's docs ... OK > > >> * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's binaries ... OK > > >> * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's legal files ... > > >> * LICENSE ... OK > > >> * NOTICE ... OK > > >> * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's plugin directory ... OK > > >> * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's lib directory ... OK > > >> > > >> Validating source distribution > > >> > > >> * downloading Apache TinkerPop 3.2.2 (apache-tinkerpop-3.2.2-src. > > zip)... > > >> OK > > >> * validating signatures and checksums ... > > >> * PGP signature ... OK > > >> * MD5 checksum ... OK > > >> * SHA1 checksum ... OK > > >> * unzipping Apache TinkerPop 3.2.2 ... OK > > >> OK > > >> > > >> The docs seem to be correct, but I don't like how we now have the > > numbered > > >> indents, e.g: > > >> > > >> gremlin> g.V().hasLabel("person").groupCount().by(values("age"). > choose( > > >> ......1> is(lt(28)),constant("young"), > > >> ......2> choose(is(lt(30)), > > >> ......3> constant("old"), > > >> ......4> constant("very old")))) > > >> ==>[young:1,old:1,very old:2] > > >> > > >> > > >> This is bad, since our snippets are now no longer copy+pastable. I > will > > >> fix > > >> that for the next release. > > >> > > >> All in all: VOTE: +1 > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> Daniel > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Stephen Mallette < > [email protected] > > <javascript:;>> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hello, > > >> > > > >> > We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.2.2 is ready for release. > > >> > > > >> > The release artifacts can be found at this location: > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/3.2.2/ > > >> > > > >> > The source distribution is provided by: > > >> > apache-tinkerpop-3.2.2-src.zip > > >> > > > >> > Two binary distributions are provided for user convenience: > > >> > apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.2.2-bin.zip > > >> > apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-3.2.2-bin.zip > > >> > > > >> > The GPG key used to sign the release artifacts is available at: > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/KEYS > > >> > > > >> > The online docs can be found here: > > >> > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.2/ (user docs) > > >> > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.2/upgrade/ (upgrade docs) > > >> > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.2/core/ (core javadoc) > > >> > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.2/full/ (full javadoc) > > >> > > > >> > The tag in Apache Git can be found here: > > >> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tinkerpop.git;a=tag;h= > > >> > 16d28c16ea43c678a18061506b4f0dc6a384fa1e > > >> > > > >> > The release notes are available here: > > >> > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.2.2/ > > >> > CHANGELOG.asciidoc#tinkerpop-322-release-date-september-9-2016 > > >> > > > >> > The [VOTE] will be open for the next 72 hours --- closing Friday > > >> (September > > >> > 9, 2016) at 4pm. > > >> > > > >> > My vote is +1. > > >> > > > >> > Thank you very much, > > >> > > > >> > Stephen > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > null >
