Just to close the loop on this thread, the new VOTE thread is here:

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3182f5995f5e5ab0cb210553124501d1544bfffbf3d4109242da988a@%3Cdev.tinkerpop.apache.org%3E

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Daniel Kuppitz <m...@gremlin.guru> wrote:

> >
> > The moral of the story: Use this (carefully) when you hear someone say
> > "we" and you need to count yourself out.
>
>
> I don't need to count myself out, since I was just waiting for you, so I
> can rebase and merge the other fixes ;)
>
> https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/commits/master
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Who is this “we” kemosabe?
> >         http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WhoDoYouMeanWeKemoSabe <
> > http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WhoDoYouMeanWeKemoSabe>
> >
> > Marko.
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Sep 7, 2016, at 3:53 PM, Daniel Kuppitz <m...@gremlin.guru> wrote:
> > >
> > > The last issue just got fixed in master/. Damn, we can be so fast &
> > > effective :).
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Daniel Kuppitz <m...@gremlin.guru>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> The aforementioned issues are fixed, but now we've just found another
> > bug:
> > >>
> > >> gremlin> g.withBulk(false).withSack(1.0f,sum).V(1).local(outE('knows'
> > >> ).barrier(normSack).inV()).in('knows').barrier().sack() //*(6)*
> > >> ==>1.0
> > >> ==>1.0
> > >> ==>1.0
> > >> ...
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> The 1.0's go on and on. Unfortunately one more reason to delay the
> 3.2.2
> > >> release.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Stephen Mallette <
> spmalle...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> This VOTE is cancelled - we have to scrap this build. Weak.
> > >>>
> > >>> Kuppitz has a bug fix under test right now. On top of his fix, I will
> > >>> officially correct the "bad link" to GLVs that Robert found (thanks
> for
> > >>> reviewing/voting btw). Expect a new VOTE thread later today once this
> > is
> > >>> all settled.
> > >>>
> > >>> Note that 3.1.4 did not have this problem so that VOTE can stay open
> -
> > i
> > >>> just tested that out to be sure:
> > >>>
> > >>> gremlin> g.V(ids).as("a").
> > >>> gremlin>
> > >>> repeat(bothE().otherV().simplePath()).times(5).emit(hasId(
> > >>> within(ids))).as("b").
> > >>> gremlin> filter(select(last,"a","b").by(id).where("a", lt("b"))).
> > >>> gremlin>  path().by().by(label)
> > >>> ==>[v[2], knows, v[1], knows, v[4]]
> > >>> ==>[v[2], knows, v[1], created, v[3], created, v[4]]
> > >>> ==>[v[2], knows, v[1], created, v[3], created, v[6]]
> > >>> ==>[v[2], knows, v[1], knows, v[4], created, v[3], created, v[6]]
> > >>> ==>[v[4], created, v[3], created, v[6]]
> > >>> ==>[v[4], knows, v[1], created, v[3], created, v[6]]
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Stephen Mallette <
> spmalle...@gmail.com
> > >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Kuppitz saw a problem in one of the recipes - note the second
> example:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.2/recipes/
> > >>>>
> > >>>> no results and this was working in 3.2.1:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.1/recipes/
> > >>>>
> > >>>> His gremlin session shows:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> gremlin> g.V().hasId(1)
> > >>>> ==>v[1]
> > >>>> gremlin> g.V().hasId(within(1,2))
> > >>>> gremlin>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> so damn - i guess we need to scrap this release and fix that problem
> > - i
> > >>>> guess i'm -1 based on that..........anyone have a clue as to what
> > >>> changed
> > >>>> to cause that problem?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Daniel Kuppitz <m...@gremlin.guru>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Validation looks good:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> $ bin/validate-distribution.sh 3.2.2
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Validating binary distributions
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> * downloading Apache TinkerPop Gremlin
> > >>>>> (apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.2.2-bin.zip)... OK
> > >>>>> * validating signatures and checksums ...
> > >>>>>  * PGP signature ... OK
> > >>>>>  * MD5 checksum ... OK
> > >>>>>  * SHA1 checksum ... OK
> > >>>>> * unzipping Apache TinkerPop Gremlin ... OK
> > >>>>> * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's docs ... OK
> > >>>>> * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's binaries ... OK
> > >>>>> * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's legal files ...
> > >>>>>  * LICENSE ... OK
> > >>>>>  * NOTICE ... OK
> > >>>>> * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's plugin directory ... OK
> > >>>>> * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's lib directory ... OK
> > >>>>> * testing script evaluation ... OK
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> * downloading Apache TinkerPop Gremlin
> > >>>>> (apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-3.2.2-bin.zip)... OK
> > >>>>> * validating signatures and checksums ...
> > >>>>>  * PGP signature ... OK
> > >>>>>  * MD5 checksum ... OK
> > >>>>>  * SHA1 checksum ... OK
> > >>>>> * unzipping Apache TinkerPop Gremlin ... OK
> > >>>>> * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's docs ... OK
> > >>>>> * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's binaries ... OK
> > >>>>> * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's legal files ...
> > >>>>>  * LICENSE ... OK
> > >>>>>  * NOTICE ... OK
> > >>>>> * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's plugin directory ... OK
> > >>>>> * validating Apache TinkerPop Gremlin's lib directory ... OK
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Validating source distribution
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> * downloading Apache TinkerPop 3.2.2 (apache-tinkerpop-3.2.2-src.zi
> > >>> p)...
> > >>>>> OK
> > >>>>> * validating signatures and checksums ...
> > >>>>>  * PGP signature ... OK
> > >>>>>  * MD5 checksum ... OK
> > >>>>>  * SHA1 checksum ... OK
> > >>>>> * unzipping Apache TinkerPop 3.2.2 ... OK
> > >>>>> OK
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The docs seem to be correct, but I don't like how we now have the
> > >>> numbered
> > >>>>> indents, e.g:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> gremlin> g.V().hasLabel("person").groupCount().by(values("age").
> > choos
> > >>> e(
> > >>>>> ......1>   is(lt(28)),constant("young"),
> > >>>>> ......2>   choose(is(lt(30)),
> > >>>>> ......3>          constant("old"),
> > >>>>> ......4>          constant("very old"))))
> > >>>>> ==>[young:1,old:1,very old:2]
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This is bad, since our snippets are now no longer copy+pastable. I
> > will
> > >>>>> fix
> > >>>>> that for the next release.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> All in all: VOTE: +1
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>> Daniel
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Stephen Mallette <
> > >>> spmalle...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hello,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.2.2 is ready for
> release.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> The release artifacts can be found at this location:
> > >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/3.2.2/
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> The source distribution is provided by:
> > >>>>>> apache-tinkerpop-3.2.2-src.zip
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Two binary distributions are provided for user convenience:
> > >>>>>> apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-3.2.2-bin.zip
> > >>>>>> apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-3.2.2-bin.zip
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> The GPG key used to sign the release artifacts is available at:
> > >>>>>>    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tinkerpop/KEYS
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> The online docs can be found here:
> > >>>>>> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.2/ (user docs)
> > >>>>>> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.2/upgrade/ (upgrade docs)
> > >>>>>> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.2/core/ (core javadoc)
> > >>>>>> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/javadocs/3.2.2/full/ (full javadoc)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> The tag in Apache Git can be found here:
> > >>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tinkerpop.git;a=tag;h=
> > >>>>>> 16d28c16ea43c678a18061506b4f0dc6a384fa1e
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> The release notes are available here:
> > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.2.2/
> > >>>>>> CHANGELOG.asciidoc#tinkerpop-322-release-date-september-9-2016
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> The [VOTE] will be open for the next 72 hours --- closing Friday
> > >>>>> (September
> > >>>>>> 9, 2016) at 4pm.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> My vote is +1.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thank you very much,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Stephen
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to