I sorta share that sentiment however, I think we had that discussion back when we determined our listing requirements and we figured we couldn't figure out how to easily quantify "mature".
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Jean-Baptiste Musso <jbmu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Interesting thing. +1 to adding HGraphDB to the list. > > Minor concern: I'm not sure if we want to manage a curated list of > implementations and maybe restrict to more mature projects. I'm just > thinking out loud here: I'm not targeting HGraphDB specifically (and I wish > them good luck - *cheers*). My main concern is that the project is very > young, but graph databases need as much publicity as they can. > > Jean-Baptiste > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > Robert Yokota notified us today that he has developed an > > Apache TinkerPop enabled graph db: https://github.com/rayokota/hgraphdb. > > Correct me if I'm wrong Robert, but it looks like it's at the TinkerPop > > 3.2.3 version. > > > > I think HGraphDB meets our index listing requirements but I wanted to > bring > > it up > > just in case anyone felt differently. Unless there are any objections, > > I'll assume lazy > > consensus in three days (Sunday, November 13, 2016 2:00 CST) and add > > HGraphDB > > to the graph systems listing. > > > > Thanks, > > Ted > > >
