I think at this point it's not too big of a problem and yeah, your point about it giving dormant projects a possible boost is a good one. Perhaps in a few months we can reevaluate and if things look a little out of control we could introduce an every 3-4 months "pruning" of projects that no longer meet the criteria.
--Ted On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah - I think I'd come up with the "current or previous 'y' version" > stipulation. I still like that as a measure of "active" but at the same > time I've not really wanted to apply it a heavy-handed way. Projects that > become dormant may be helped by the promotion provided by TinkerPop (e.g. > someone finds ts-tinkerpop through the listing and starts to try to > contribute to it). Maybe it's not too big a problem yet? > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Jason Plurad <plur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 on the HGraphDB index listing. > > > > I think another minor concern is how to handle projects that have gone > > dormant, like ts-tinkerpop or scalajs-gremlin-client for example. > > Understanding how versions line up between TinkerPop and whatever > database > > or library they want to use has been a pain point for many users. > > > > My emphasis below: > > > > The project must be *actively* developed/maintained to a current or > > previous "y" version of Apache TinkerPop (3.y.z). > > > > -- Jason > > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I sorta share that sentiment however, I think we had that discussion > back > > > when we determined our listing requirements and we figured we couldn't > > > figure out how to easily quantify "mature". > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Jean-Baptiste Musso < > jbmu...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Interesting thing. +1 to adding HGraphDB to the list. > > > > > > > > Minor concern: I'm not sure if we want to manage a curated list of > > > > implementations and maybe restrict to more mature projects. I'm just > > > > thinking out loud here: I'm not targeting HGraphDB specifically (and > I > > > wish > > > > them good luck - *cheers*). My main concern is that the project is > very > > > > young, but graph databases need as much publicity as they can. > > > > > > > > Jean-Baptiste > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > Robert Yokota notified us today that he has developed an > > > > > Apache TinkerPop enabled graph db: https://github.com/rayokota/ > > > hgraphdb. > > > > > Correct me if I'm wrong Robert, but it looks like it's at the > > TinkerPop > > > > > 3.2.3 version. > > > > > > > > > > I think HGraphDB meets our index listing requirements but I wanted > to > > > > bring > > > > > it up > > > > > just in case anyone felt differently. Unless there are any > > objections, > > > > > I'll assume lazy > > > > > consensus in three days (Sunday, November 13, 2016 2:00 CST) and > add > > > > > HGraphDB > > > > > to the graph systems listing. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Ted > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
