+1 on the HGraphDB index listing. I think another minor concern is how to handle projects that have gone dormant, like ts-tinkerpop or scalajs-gremlin-client for example. Understanding how versions line up between TinkerPop and whatever database or library they want to use has been a pain point for many users.
My emphasis below: The project must be *actively* developed/maintained to a current or previous "y" version of Apache TinkerPop (3.y.z). -- Jason On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: > I sorta share that sentiment however, I think we had that discussion back > when we determined our listing requirements and we figured we couldn't > figure out how to easily quantify "mature". > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Jean-Baptiste Musso <jbmu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Interesting thing. +1 to adding HGraphDB to the list. > > > > Minor concern: I'm not sure if we want to manage a curated list of > > implementations and maybe restrict to more mature projects. I'm just > > thinking out loud here: I'm not targeting HGraphDB specifically (and I > wish > > them good luck - *cheers*). My main concern is that the project is very > > young, but graph databases need as much publicity as they can. > > > > Jean-Baptiste > > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Ted Wilmes <twil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > Robert Yokota notified us today that he has developed an > > > Apache TinkerPop enabled graph db: https://github.com/rayokota/ > hgraphdb. > > > Correct me if I'm wrong Robert, but it looks like it's at the TinkerPop > > > 3.2.3 version. > > > > > > I think HGraphDB meets our index listing requirements but I wanted to > > bring > > > it up > > > just in case anyone felt differently. Unless there are any objections, > > > I'll assume lazy > > > consensus in three days (Sunday, November 13, 2016 2:00 CST) and add > > > HGraphDB > > > to the graph systems listing. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Ted > > > > > >
