[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15656993#comment-15656993
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1545:
-------------------------------------------

Github user okram commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/486
  
    Why do you do a root recursion on every traversal? Why not use the "marker 
model" ? Also, `getRequirements()` is already recursive off the root traversal 
steps. I would do this:
    
    1. If root -- search for `SimplePathStep`, `CyclicPathStep`, 
`LambdaHolder`, `Path`, `Tree`, ?
    2. If one exists, mark all child traversals with hidden label.
    3. If a child - am I marked, yes? remove the mark and return. No? do the 
rewrite.


> IncidentToAdjacentStrategy is buggy
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-1545
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1545
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.4, 3.2.3
>            Reporter: Daniel Kuppitz
>            Assignee: Daniel Kuppitz
>
> {{IncidentToAdjacentStrategy}} turns {{outE().inV().simplePath()}} into 
> {{out().simplePath()}}, which will return a wrong result as soon as there is 
> more than 1 edge between a pair of vertices.
> The set {{INVALIDATING_STEP_CLASSES}} should only contain 
> {{PathProcessor.class}} and {{LambdaHolder.class}} Furthermore 
> {{SimplePathStep}} should implement {{PathProcessor}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to