I've pushed the 3.4.9-SNAPSHOT documentation for those interested in doing a review:
https://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.4.9-SNAPSHOT/ The upgrade docs are especially full this release. Definitely the longest list of improvements on 3.4.x since 3.4.0: https://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.4.9-SNAPSHOT/upgrade/ On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 4:18 PM Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote: > Following up on TINKERPOP-2438 - I think I've addressed the performance > issue that was noted. It's not a perfect solution but it was easy/obvious > and I feel safe enough to merge: > > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1368 > > I've formed the pull request for review with the intention to merge it for > 3.4.9. Running docker tests now - please let me know if there are any > concerns. > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 5:12 PM Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> As we roll into 3.4.9 code freeze week we can use this thread for any >> issues or concerns that are found related to testing this week. >> >> To get the ball rolling, a regression has been noticed in performance >> around low-latency scripts and seems to be related to the new >> GremlinASTChecker. My earlier tests on this feature didn't note the >> cumulative damage of the additional AST processing that would occur on >> small/fast scripts where it is much harder to hide millisecond range >> increments. I've reverted that functionality: >> >> >> https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/commit/daad70bec96d4a1d3a0579bee1b73934d9293664 >> >> and reopened the issue: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2438 >> >> I opted to not revert the entire body of work because I think the idea is >> still valid in general but it needs more attention paid to these particular >> queries. I also don't think it's a reason to pause 3.4.9 release over. This >> release is too full of features to let this issue hold things up. >> >> I've published a 3.4.9-SNAPSHOT if you're like to test and I will post >> back when freshy docs are published. >> >>
