I've done all the post-release work. 3.4-dev is open for business again. Thanks!
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 7:37 AM Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for noticing that - fixed that last week with: > > > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/commit/d51253ae515fe822fd7d5f4c8d7761f9ebad1704 > > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 4:29 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think I found a minor error in the upgrade docs: The link in the >> section Per Request Options that should point to the Gremlin Drivers and >> Variants section of the reference docs instead tries to find that section >> in the upgrade docs. So, the link is broken. >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Dezember 2020 14:37 >> An: [email protected] >> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] code freeze 3.4.9 >> >> I've pushed the 3.4.9-SNAPSHOT documentation for those interested in >> doing a review: >> >> https://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.4.9-SNAPSHOT/ >> >> The upgrade docs are especially full this release. Definitely the longest >> list of improvements on 3.4.x since 3.4.0: >> >> https://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.4.9-SNAPSHOT/upgrade/ >> >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 4:18 PM Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Following up on TINKERPOP-2438 - I think I've addressed the >> > performance issue that was noted. It's not a perfect solution but it >> > was easy/obvious and I feel safe enough to merge: >> > >> > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1368 >> > >> > I've formed the pull request for review with the intention to merge it >> > for 3.4.9. Running docker tests now - please let me know if there are >> > any concerns. >> > >> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 5:12 PM Stephen Mallette >> > <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> As we roll into 3.4.9 code freeze week we can use this thread for any >> >> issues or concerns that are found related to testing this week. >> >> >> >> To get the ball rolling, a regression has been noticed in performance >> >> around low-latency scripts and seems to be related to the new >> >> GremlinASTChecker. My earlier tests on this feature didn't note the >> >> cumulative damage of the additional AST processing that would occur >> >> on small/fast scripts where it is much harder to hide millisecond >> >> range increments. I've reverted that functionality: >> >> >> >> >> >> https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/commit/daad70bec96d4a1d3a0579bee1 >> >> b73934d9293664 >> >> >> >> and reopened the issue: >> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2438 >> >> >> >> I opted to not revert the entire body of work because I think the >> >> idea is still valid in general but it needs more attention paid to >> >> these particular queries. I also don't think it's a reason to pause >> >> 3.4.9 release over. This release is too full of features to let this >> issue hold things up. >> >> >> >> I've published a 3.4.9-SNAPSHOT if you're like to test and I will >> >> post back when freshy docs are published. >> >> >> >> >> >>
