Thanks for noticing that - fixed that last week with: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/commit/d51253ae515fe822fd7d5f4c8d7761f9ebad1704
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 4:29 AM <f...@florian-hockmann.de> wrote: > I think I found a minor error in the upgrade docs: The link in the section > Per Request Options that should point to the Gremlin Drivers and Variants > section of the reference docs instead tries to find that section in the > upgrade docs. So, the link is broken. > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Dezember 2020 14:37 > An: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] code freeze 3.4.9 > > I've pushed the 3.4.9-SNAPSHOT documentation for those interested in doing > a review: > > https://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.4.9-SNAPSHOT/ > > The upgrade docs are especially full this release. Definitely the longest > list of improvements on 3.4.x since 3.4.0: > > https://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.4.9-SNAPSHOT/upgrade/ > > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 4:18 PM Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Following up on TINKERPOP-2438 - I think I've addressed the > > performance issue that was noted. It's not a perfect solution but it > > was easy/obvious and I feel safe enough to merge: > > > > https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1368 > > > > I've formed the pull request for review with the intention to merge it > > for 3.4.9. Running docker tests now - please let me know if there are > > any concerns. > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 5:12 PM Stephen Mallette > > <spmalle...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> As we roll into 3.4.9 code freeze week we can use this thread for any > >> issues or concerns that are found related to testing this week. > >> > >> To get the ball rolling, a regression has been noticed in performance > >> around low-latency scripts and seems to be related to the new > >> GremlinASTChecker. My earlier tests on this feature didn't note the > >> cumulative damage of the additional AST processing that would occur > >> on small/fast scripts where it is much harder to hide millisecond > >> range increments. I've reverted that functionality: > >> > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/commit/daad70bec96d4a1d3a0579bee1 > >> b73934d9293664 > >> > >> and reopened the issue: > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2438 > >> > >> I opted to not revert the entire body of work because I think the > >> idea is still valid in general but it needs more attention paid to > >> these particular queries. I also don't think it's a reason to pause > >> 3.4.9 release over. This release is too full of features to let this > issue hold things up. > >> > >> I've published a 3.4.9-SNAPSHOT if you're like to test and I will > >> post back when freshy docs are published. > >> > >> > >
