[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17946195#comment-17946195
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-3147:
-------------------------------------------
andreachild commented on code in PR #3096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/3096#discussion_r2052795385
##########
gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/traversal/step/sideEffect/AggregateLocalStep.java:
##########
@@ -87,6 +87,10 @@ public List<Traversal.Admin<S, Object>> getLocalChildren() {
@Override
public void modulateBy(final Traversal.Admin<?, ?> storeTraversal) {
+ if (this.storeTraversal != null)
+ {
Review Comment:
Nit: following existing syntax conventions this curly brace should be on the
same line as the if statement
> Prevent aggregate step from having multiple by modulators
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TINKERPOP-3147
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3147
> Project: TinkerPop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: process
> Affects Versions: 3.7.3
> Reporter: Andrea C
> Priority: Minor
>
> Aggregate step will ignore previous by modulators if multiple are specified,
> which can be misleading to the user. Instead, similar to
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3121 multiple by modulators
> should be prevented with aggregate.
> {code:java}
> gremlin> g.V().aggregate('x').by('name').cap('x')
> ==>[marko,vadas,lop,josh,ripple,peter]
> gremlin> g.V().aggregate('x').by('name').by('age').cap('x')
> ==>[29,27,32,35] {code}
>
> Note that `store` step is an alias to `aggregate` and should also be
> prevented from having multiple by modulators.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
