[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18008146#comment-18008146
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-3141:
-------------------------------------------

vkagamlyk commented on code in PR #3161:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/3161#discussion_r2216833048


##########
tinkergraph-gremlin/src/test/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/tinkergraph/structure/TinkerTransactionGraphTest.java:
##########
@@ -1503,4 +1504,53 @@ public void 
shouldHandleCorrectlyHandleCountForChangedAndReadElement() {
 
         assertFalse(vertex.inUse());
     }
+
+    @Test
+    public void shouldAllowDropThenInsertInSameTransaction() {

Review Comment:
   test scenarios that can be considered for reliability:
   - add and remove vertex with same ID in single transaction. It can be 4 
tests, combinations like add-remove-add, add-remove-add-remove,  
remove-add-remove-add, remove-add-remove. Existing tests covers only cases like 
add-remove, for example `shouldDeleteCreatedVertexOnCommit`
   - some multi-threaded test case, like remove-add in main thread (without 
commit) and remove-add-remove in another thread. Example of similar test is 
`shouldDeleteUnusedVertexContainerOnConcurrentVertexDelete`





> TinkerTransactionGraph doesn't allow deleting and adding element back in same 
> transaction
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-3141
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-3141
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: tinkergraph
>    Affects Versions: 3.7.3
>            Reporter: Ken Hu
>            Priority: Critical
>
> Originally discovered from:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79467860/issue-with-transactions-in-local-tinkerpop-gremlin-setup
> [https://groups.google.com/g/gremlin-users/c/NRwb4xy2eXs]
>  
> An element with the same Id cannot be dropped and then added back in the same 
> transaction.
>  
> {code:java}
> @Test
> public void shouldAllowDropThenInsert() throws InterruptedException {
>     final TinkerTransactionGraph g = TinkerTransactionGraph.open();
>     final GraphTraversalSource gtx = g.tx().begin();
>     gtx.addV().property(T.id, 1).next();
>     gtx.tx().commit();
>     GraphTraversalSource gtx2 = g.tx().begin();
>     gtx2.V().drop().iterate();
>     gtx.addV().property(T.id, 1).next();
>     gtx2.tx().commit();
>     assertEquals(1, g.getVertices().size());
> } {code}
> throws a TransactionException.
> This occurs when the transaction attempts to get updated, the old 
> vertex"isDeletedInTx" but has a different txNumber than the newly created 
> vertex.
> [https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.7.3/tinkergraph-gremlin/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/tinkergraph/structure/TinkerElementContainer.java#L185]
>  should probably allow this case through.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to