> -----Original Message----- > From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 10:24 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: Tomcat 6 source organisation > > On 2/28/06, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We can have maven2 dependency management without use maven2 > complete. > > > > see. http://maven.apache.org/ant-tasks.html >
We've had some problems with the <m2 /> tasks over in Gump-land. > I have no problem with using maven or similar tasks for downloading > the deps, if they > can provide the same functionality with our build hacks, or at least > use them for the simple > cases. > I'm not sure that Maven could handle the current tomcat-dbcp task well, and I don't really see a use-case for a mixed dependency management system myself. > I'm just -1 on using a framework that forces a particular way to do > things ( nothing personal > with maven, same -1 for any other framework :-). I know people have > religious ideas about > right and wrong, and frameworks is an expression of this - I just hope > I won't see this in tomcat... > Also my personal opinion. Also, Gump doesn't currently support Maven2, so we'd loose Gump by going to Maven2 (which, some people might think is a-good-thing :). > It may be good to look at what other options exists for download and > pick one that is easy to use and fits well - maven might be the best > or not, that's one benefit of picking components and tools instead of > 'they know better' frameworks. > > Costin > > > > > I thing maven is good for standard prepare/compile/test, > but is heavy > > to use with spezial things like the current tomcat release build. I > > have heard that some "go back to ant" discussion start at the > > jetspeed project. > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > Am 28.02.2006 um 17:50 schrieb Keith Wannamaker: > > > > > +1 for consolidating into a single module/src folder. > > > > > > maven has matured since I last looked. It seems the biggest > > > advantages for us would be dependency management and a > common build > > > layout. I don't have a feel for how much work it would take to > > > convert, but it doesn't seem like we would loose much if that > > > approach were taken. > > > > > > Keith > > > > > > > > > Remy Maucherat wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> I think it is time to decide how the source repository > is going to > > >> be organized, with the questions being: > > >> - how many source folders do we need (Costin wanted one, while > > >> others like Jacob seem to want "modules") ? > > >> - do we continue to use Ant ? > > >> - etc > > >> Any ideas ? > > >> Rémy > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments. In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
