Bill Barker wrote: > > Remy was being really nice to the community by not requiring a vetoed patch > to be withdrawn. Personally, I would go with j-f-c's position, and withdraw > a vetoed patch immediately (and have done so on several occations, even when > I got to re-apply it after enough discussion took place on the list). > However, I'll go with whatever the community consensus is on this point.
But isn't that statement too broad (to apply to trunk, I agree that in a ready-to-release anytime sort of branch, disputed things should disappear for a while)... It's in the context. If Joe suggests "hey, -1 to the way you presented that, if you fix X you have my support" then it should stick a round a while and let them sort it out. If Joe says "this feature isn't going to be acceptable because Y", well then there isn't much to discuss at that point, and it probably should be backed out right away while the basic idea is debated. Clear A/B options sometimes aren't that effective. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
