Remy Maucherat wrote: > jean-frederic clere wrote: >> Well I see at least 3 reasons to revert it: >> - Prevent accidental inclusion in a release. >> - Allow a more easy testing and evaluation of a another patch that fixes >> the same thing. >> - Force the community to look for another solution. > > As much as possible, I would like to avoid reverting a patch until the > review is concluded (or there is passing review on a patch which > supersedes it), as it wastes time and is annoying to do.
Ok. Reverting it doesn't force the ones that disagree to react quicky once reverted. Now for me that just makes another chapter in the "STATUS" file: "PATCHES being discussed". After a week those patches should be accepted or reverted. Reverted patches and corresponding discussions should stay in the "STATUS" until a solution is found. I would keep a passing margin of +3. Cheers Jean-Frederic > The main other > issues are to determine: > - how long a review should last (most likely, the usual one week would do) > - the passing margin (+3 could be +2, for example) > > Rémy > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
