On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > First define 'mavenizing' please :-) > > Yes > > > > If you mean exporting tomcat components in maven repository - fine with > me. > > It's allready done (by hand) ? > > > > If you mean building tomcat with maven instead of ant - the opposite, > > absolutely not fine. > > it was the idea.
Sorry, -1 from me ( again ). > > > > Maintaining a separate maven build file - unofficial, i.e. the default > > build instructions still point to ant - maybe. > > To modularise we should use modules layout ie : > > pom.xml > > -- catalina > pom.xml > So some changes in the actual source layout. And that would be the reason for -1. If a build system requires intrusive changes and forces a particular code organization - it shouldn't be used. > Could you comment why maven is not the welcome here, ASF JackRabbit or > ApacheDS are pretty large projects and allready use it. It is a choice each project can make, some people like intrusive tools :-) I think it is great to have alternative build files - as long as the build system plays nicely with others and doesn't set conditions on how we should organize code. In particular - we have eclipse build support, it would be great to add idea/netbeans if anyone can support them - and if you can add maven in the same way ( i.e. just maven files in a separate dir, without changes to source layout just because maven needs them) - no problem with me. Costin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]