On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 08:27 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote: > I am leaning towards 4 on the basis that > a) This is trunk, not a release branch > b) This option generates no warnings > c) I assume the spec will start using generics at some point (maybe in 3.0?) > If modifying the spec interfaces seems like a step too far then 3 would be > my next choice.
There are signature tests in the TCK :( I don't think that will pass. Rémy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
