And if the TCK signature tests pass - that's a bug in the tests :-). We shouldn't touch the method signatures in servlet API.
Costin On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 08:27 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote: > > I am leaning towards 4 on the basis that > > a) This is trunk, not a release branch > > b) This option generates no warnings > > c) I assume the spec will start using generics at some point (maybe in > 3.0?) > > If modifying the spec interfaces seems like a step too far then 3 would > be > > my next choice. > > There are signature tests in the TCK :( I don't think that will pass. > > Rémy > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
