On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:00 AM, jean-frederic clere <jfcl...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On 02/17/2010 10:46 PM, Costin Manolache wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> On 02/17/2010 07:37 PM, Costin Manolache wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Mladen Turk<mt...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> The reasons I suggest using SPDY as a replacement for AJP - and > supporting > >>> SPDY > >>> > >> > >> I have nothing against SPDY and it really looks cool, > >> but IMHO it's doesn't look and feel like the rest of RFC > >> protocol specifications. > >> If you can push those guys to create a well known RFC-like > >> doc, I'm sure that overall internet community will benefit > >> from it. > >> > > > > SPDY is still in development - there is an open mailing list and > > quite a few proposals/changes/discussions. I would guess > > the end result will end up as a RFC-like. Feel free to join the > > mailing list and push or volunteer for anything :-) > > > > The implementations - chrome, mod_spdy are also open source > > and with ASF-like license. > > > > > > > >> > >> OTOH we are discussing this 'protocol thing' for years instead like > >> you noticed we concentrate on the tasks we wish to do. > >> Think if we start from the protocol side we will stay there (nowhere) > >> for few more years (although SPDY might be even more then we need). > > > > > > I think what matters is having a working SPDY implementation in tomcat, > > inter-operable > > with chrome/mod_spdy/google. If we start with this we'll probably make > > more progress than by discussing protocols :-) > > Yep, I have noted that people are preparing an implementation for httpd > so at some point it will just "porting" that code to TC. > > http://code.google.com/p/mod-spdy/ Costin > Cheers > > Jean-Frederic > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >
