On 08.03.2010 20:00, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
I propose to relax our RTC policy and use CTR for the types of changes
listed below:

2. I think that we can have C-T-R for any svn metadata (svn:
properties), as those are not the code. I am +1.


Allow C-T-R for changes to svn properties:
[ ] +1
[X] 0
[ ] -1


3. I think that we can have C-T-R for any whitespace changes in the
code. These are generally discouraged, but might be necessary to ease
backporting of patches.

Allow C-T-R for any whitespace changes:
[X] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1


4. Trivial fixes for any English message strings and message constants
in the code. I mean, inaccuracies and misprints. I am +1 for C-T-R
those.

Allow C-T-R for trivial fixes to English messages that are in resource files
and those that are inline in the code. This includes typos and rephrasing,
but does not include adding/removing message parameters.
Technical issues to beware are mentioned above.
[X] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1


5. Any fixes for any translations.

Allow C-T-R for any fixes for non-English resource files.
The files must use 7-bit characters only. Other symbols must be
escaped with \u, as does native2ascii.
[X] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1


6. Should we mark C-T-R commits somehow in the commit message?
E.g. writing "C-T-R" or "trivial" in the message?

[X] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to