On 22/01/2014 22:03, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2014/1/22 Mark Thomas <[email protected]>

>> I'll see what folks think of the patch so far and maybe explore the
>> entry/exit option as well.
>>
> The first patch however looks more complicated than the "dumb" way IMO.

The variation of the code that needs to be run (return value / no return
value, different checked exceptions) adds most of the complication.

I think I'll try, as you put it, a dumb version of the same patch and
see what it looks like.

Mark


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to