Mladen,

On 4/10/14, 10:06 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 04/10/2014 05:55 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Mladen,
>>
>> On 4/10/14, 9:29 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>> On 04/10/2014 03:15 PM, Robert Sanders wrote:
>>>> Is the TCN portion of BZ 56027 address completely or partially with
>>>> this release?
>>>
>>> Nope. This issue was not fixed with this release.
>>
>> The primary tcnative bit was in svn. Did you build 1.1/trunk, or did you
>> just apply certain patches?
>>
>> There was a followup-comment about the 512-bit RSA key generation which
>> is a separate problem IMO which has not yet been addressed.
>>
> 
> Ah, now I saw your commit.
> You will have to apply this to branches/1.1.x
> This is where the releases are coming from.
> Trunk is just a playground and probably expecting a major rewrite, so
> don't bother with it :)

r1559182 was the back-port to 1.1 branch.

-chris

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to