I think that Jean's idea is very clear about it. That isn't the first time this subject is discussed here.
"I think we can start again doing pros/cons discussion but I'm not sure it's gonna help more. We have had enough discussions I would say, so now is probably time to open a [VOTE] thread and publish [RESULT]." ==> +1 I love the idea of having something bound to Java EE too. On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > For me the choices are more restricted and B and C are not options. > > Version 2 and 5 are the most relevant options IMO for the project > consistency but 2 is almost not possible for openejb. 5 would be hardly > doable for the project "image" for tomee. > > In one word i d keep it this way evzn if not perfect. The mvn part is not > the hurting one when releasing (we all know how to fix it in less than 10mn > with bash) so not sure we need to enhance it. Other parts are and the one > we should fix from my humble opinion. > > Le 29 avr. 2015 12:25, "Jean-Louis Monteiro" <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> a > écrit : >> >> Hey Mark, >> >> I agree with the overall feeling and diagnostic. >> I have seen this topic many times raising the list without consensus or >> conclusion. >> >> I think we can start again doing pros/cons discussion but I'm not sure > it's >> gonna help more. >> We have had enough discussions I would say, so now is probably time to > open >> a [VOTE] thread and publish [RESULT]. >> >> Back in 2011, we were already talking about this and we were kinda afraid >> to announce a month after the TomEE 1.0.0, we would jump to TomEE 5, 6 or >> whatever. >> The jump was to big and would have probably been bad for the project. >> >> 4 years after and with a couple of releases and more maturity, it's >> probably no more an issue. >> I must admit that I also love the idea of having something bound to Java > EE >> (aka Option B). >> >> Jean-Louis >> >> >> -- >> Jean-Louis Monteiro >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: >> >> > the more correct approach would be to FINALLY finish the version >> > discussion. >> > >> > >> > It kind of breaks many things that we do not have a single version but > 2. >> > openejb-4.7.2 + tomee-1.7. >> > * User always break their dependencies as they have to maintain > different >> > versions all over their poms. >> > * We cannot easily release as there is no autoVersionSubModules for that >> > case. >> > * Things like that now happen as you need to manually pimp some other > poms >> > to make it fit together. >> > >> > This is really a bit schizophrenic in my opinion. >> > >> > I already vetted for using the same version number on both parts. We >> > cannot go below 4.7, so this leaves 3 options >> > >> > A.) Keep the headache we have with 2 different versions >> > B.) Use 7.x for the EE7 approach (what currently is in trunk aka > TomEE-2) >> > C.) Use 8.x to reflect it is base don Tomcat8 >> > >> > I’d personally go for B. >> > What are the pros and cons? >> > >> > LieGrue, >> > strub >> > >> > >> > >> > > Am 28.04.2015 um 17:45 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com >> > >: >> > > >> > > yes, think it is the kind of things we have to do in the release > branch >> > > >> > > >> > > Romain Manni-Bucau >> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber >> > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> >> > > >> > > 2015-04-28 17:39 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore < > jgallim...@tomitribe.com >> > >: >> > > >> > >> Will revert that as soon as I can. Happy to try not pushing that > commit >> > if >> > >> I have to try again. >> > >> >> > >> Jon >> > >> >> > >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >> > rmannibu...@gmail.com >> > >>> >> > >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >>> why does it hit our repo? it breaks projects depending on us (like >> > >>> deltaspike) >> > >>> >> > >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >> > >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> > >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >> > >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >> > >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber >> > >>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> >> > >>> >> > >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> > >>> From: <jgallim...@apache.org> >> > >>> Date: 2015-04-28 17:33 GMT+02:00 >> > >>> Subject: tomee git commit: Updating variables for release >> > >>> To: comm...@tomee.apache.org >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> Repository: tomee >> > >>> Updated Branches: >> > >>> refs/heads/tomee-1.7.x 37d66623e -> 88910204c >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> Updating variables for release >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/repo >> > >>> Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/commit/88910204 >> > >>> Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tree/88910204 >> > >>> Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/diff/88910204 >> > >>> >> > >>> Branch: refs/heads/tomee-1.7.x >> > >>> Commit: 88910204c6e93e6ab39cda542075a0074ae05f95 >> > >>> Parents: 37d6662 >> > >>> Author: Jonathan Gallimore <j...@jrg.me.uk> >> > >>> Authored: Tue Apr 28 15:32:59 2015 +0000 >> > >>> Committer: Jonathan Gallimore <j...@jrg.me.uk> >> > >>> Committed: Tue Apr 28 15:32:59 2015 +0000 >> > >>> >> > >>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >>> pom.xml | 4 ++-- >> > >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> > >>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/blob/88910204/pom.xml >> > >>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >>> diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml >> > >>> index 012e22f..83a1501 100644 >> > >>> --- a/pom.xml >> > >>> +++ b/pom.xml >> > >>> @@ -97,8 +97,8 @@ >> > >>> >> > >> > <test.complexity.coverage.minimun>0</test.complexity.coverage.minimun> >> > >>> <test.branch.coverage.minimun>0</test.branch.coverage.minimun> >> > >>> <test.coverage.skip>false</test.coverage.skip> >> > >>> - <openejb.version>4.7.2-SNAPSHOT</openejb.version> >> > >>> - <tomee.version>1.7.2-SNAPSHOT</tomee.version> >> > >>> + <openejb.version>4.7.2</openejb.version> >> > >>> + <tomee.version>1.7.2</tomee.version> >> > >>> >> > >>> <openjpa.version>2.4.0</openjpa.version> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > <org.apache.openwebbeans.version>1.2.7</org.apache.openwebbeans.version> >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> Jonathan Gallimore >> > >> http://twitter.com/jongallimore >> > >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> > >> >> > >> > -- Best regard, Daniel Cunha (soro)
