let's *do* it then, @JL sinceyou throw the idea do you want to start it?
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> 2015-04-29 13:08 GMT+02:00 Daniel Cunha <[email protected]>: > I think that Jean's idea is very clear about it. That isn't the first > time this subject is discussed here. > > "I think we can start again doing pros/cons discussion but I'm not sure > it's > gonna help more. > We have had enough discussions I would say, so now is probably time to open > a [VOTE] thread and publish [RESULT]." ==> +1 > > I love the idea of having something bound to Java EE too. > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > <[email protected]> wrote: > > For me the choices are more restricted and B and C are not options. > > > > Version 2 and 5 are the most relevant options IMO for the project > > consistency but 2 is almost not possible for openejb. 5 would be hardly > > doable for the project "image" for tomee. > > > > In one word i d keep it this way evzn if not perfect. The mvn part is not > > the hurting one when releasing (we all know how to fix it in less than > 10mn > > with bash) so not sure we need to enhance it. Other parts are and the one > > we should fix from my humble opinion. > > > > Le 29 avr. 2015 12:25, "Jean-Louis Monteiro" <[email protected]> > a > > écrit : > >> > >> Hey Mark, > >> > >> I agree with the overall feeling and diagnostic. > >> I have seen this topic many times raising the list without consensus or > >> conclusion. > >> > >> I think we can start again doing pros/cons discussion but I'm not sure > > it's > >> gonna help more. > >> We have had enough discussions I would say, so now is probably time to > > open > >> a [VOTE] thread and publish [RESULT]. > >> > >> Back in 2011, we were already talking about this and we were kinda > afraid > >> to announce a month after the TomEE 1.0.0, we would jump to TomEE 5, 6 > or > >> whatever. > >> The jump was to big and would have probably been bad for the project. > >> > >> 4 years after and with a couple of releases and more maturity, it's > >> probably no more an issue. > >> I must admit that I also love the idea of having something bound to Java > > EE > >> (aka Option B). > >> > >> Jean-Louis > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Jean-Louis Monteiro > >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > >> http://www.tomitribe.com > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > the more correct approach would be to FINALLY finish the version > >> > discussion. > >> > > >> > > >> > It kind of breaks many things that we do not have a single version but > > 2. > >> > openejb-4.7.2 + tomee-1.7. > >> > * User always break their dependencies as they have to maintain > > different > >> > versions all over their poms. > >> > * We cannot easily release as there is no autoVersionSubModules for > that > >> > case. > >> > * Things like that now happen as you need to manually pimp some other > > poms > >> > to make it fit together. > >> > > >> > This is really a bit schizophrenic in my opinion. > >> > > >> > I already vetted for using the same version number on both parts. We > >> > cannot go below 4.7, so this leaves 3 options > >> > > >> > A.) Keep the headache we have with 2 different versions > >> > B.) Use 7.x for the EE7 approach (what currently is in trunk aka > > TomEE-2) > >> > C.) Use 8.x to reflect it is base don Tomcat8 > >> > > >> > I’d personally go for B. > >> > What are the pros and cons? > >> > > >> > LieGrue, > >> > strub > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Am 28.04.2015 um 17:45 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > > [email protected] > >> > >: > >> > > > >> > > yes, think it is the kind of things we have to do in the release > > branch > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Romain Manni-Bucau > >> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > >> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > >> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > >> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > >> > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> > >> > > > >> > > 2015-04-28 17:39 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore < > > [email protected] > >> > >: > >> > > > >> > >> Will revert that as soon as I can. Happy to try not pushing that > > commit > >> > if > >> > >> I have to try again. > >> > >> > >> > >> Jon > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > >> > [email protected] > >> > >>> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> why does it hit our repo? it breaks projects depending on us (like > >> > >>> deltaspike) > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Romain Manni-Bucau > >> > >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > >> > >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > >> > >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > >> > >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > >> > >>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >> > >>> From: <[email protected]> > >> > >>> Date: 2015-04-28 17:33 GMT+02:00 > >> > >>> Subject: tomee git commit: Updating variables for release > >> > >>> To: [email protected] > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Repository: tomee > >> > >>> Updated Branches: > >> > >>> refs/heads/tomee-1.7.x 37d66623e -> 88910204c > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Updating variables for release > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/repo > >> > >>> Commit: > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/commit/88910204 > >> > >>> Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tree/88910204 > >> > >>> Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/diff/88910204 > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Branch: refs/heads/tomee-1.7.x > >> > >>> Commit: 88910204c6e93e6ab39cda542075a0074ae05f95 > >> > >>> Parents: 37d6662 > >> > >>> Author: Jonathan Gallimore <[email protected]> > >> > >>> Authored: Tue Apr 28 15:32:59 2015 +0000 > >> > >>> Committer: Jonathan Gallimore <[email protected]> > >> > >>> Committed: Tue Apr 28 15:32:59 2015 +0000 > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >>> pom.xml | 4 ++-- > >> > >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/blob/88910204/pom.xml > >> > >>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >>> diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml > >> > >>> index 012e22f..83a1501 100644 > >> > >>> --- a/pom.xml > >> > >>> +++ b/pom.xml > >> > >>> @@ -97,8 +97,8 @@ > >> > >>> > >> > >> > > <test.complexity.coverage.minimun>0</test.complexity.coverage.minimun> > >> > >>> <test.branch.coverage.minimun>0</test.branch.coverage.minimun> > >> > >>> <test.coverage.skip>false</test.coverage.skip> > >> > >>> - <openejb.version>4.7.2-SNAPSHOT</openejb.version> > >> > >>> - <tomee.version>1.7.2-SNAPSHOT</tomee.version> > >> > >>> + <openejb.version>4.7.2</openejb.version> > >> > >>> + <tomee.version>1.7.2</tomee.version> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> <openjpa.version>2.4.0</openjpa.version> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > > <org.apache.openwebbeans.version>1.2.7</org.apache.openwebbeans.version> > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Jonathan Gallimore > >> > >> http://twitter.com/jongallimore > >> > >> http://www.tomitribe.com > >> > >> > >> > > >> > > > > > -- > Best regard, > Daniel Cunha (soro) >
