@Jon: no cause we didn't change any dependencies outside asf
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> 2016-05-24 11:57 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>: > I did a run over dependencies and couldn't find anything. > > > So here is my > > > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > > On Monday, 23 May 2016, 23:48, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Le 23 mai 2016 23:42, "Jean-Louis Monteiro" > > <[email protected]> a > > écrit : > >> > >> So what is the status regarding the LICENSE and NOTICE? > > > > Nothing patrticular. > > > >> Don't want to spend time checking the release if there is still pending > >> tasks to do. > >> > >> We have agreed that the documentation needs to be clear regarding the > >> status of this release (not Java EE 6 certified nor Java EE 7 > certified). > >> Could we have that download page to be split into something like 2 > parts: > >> 1.x and 7.x > >> With the information on the policy at the top. > >> Each section explicitly mentioning which Java EE version are we > >> implementing, if it is certified and what is complete or not in the > TomEE > >> 7.x > >> The current version with all the links at the top looks now a bit messy > > and > >> the policy on a separate page makes it difficult to find out in my > > opinion. > >> > > > > Was planning to just keep 1 version by minor for maintained releases + > link > > the version policy. All other versions would go in archives. That is my > > second task once vote passed. > > > > This is however out of vote scope, version policy page work has been done > > and nobody complained in 5 days so guess it is fine to go then we can > > enhance it if needed but i dont see it anymore as a blocker - compared to > > the lack of votes ;). > > > >> That seemed to be the agreement of the last vote. > >> > >> That said, I spent some time grabbing the sources and trying to compile > >> without success. > >> XAPoolTest keeps failing locally when I run it with openejb-core > >> > > > > The code of this vote was green on buildbot when tagged so can likely be > > something else or envrt dpd. Ping me if you need help. > > > >> Alone it works. I'll check that out tomorrow if I can get the test > > fixed > >> and more reliable (if possible). > >> > > > > Thanks for taking time to have a look. > > > > > >> > >> -- > >> Jean-Louis Monteiro > >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > >> http://www.tomitribe.com > >> > >> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:16 PM, John D. Ament > > <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:40 PM David Blevins > > <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > On May 19, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > >> > [email protected]> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > 2016-05-20 1:23 GMT+02:00 David Blevins > > <[email protected]>: > >> > > > > >> > > >> Also, we’ve historically done a preview run in advance > > of an > > official > >> > > vote > >> > > >> for major releases: > >> > > >> > >> > > >> [PREVIEW] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1034) > >> > > >> http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/jjiheacmtd4tb6qw > >> > > >> > >> > > >> [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-092) > >> > > >> http://markmail.org/message/u6ripoz3lsxvcron > >> > > >> > >> > > >> 1.0.0 preview binaries > >> > > >> http://markmail.org/message/f6ix44zeqlcaet3w > >> > > >> > >> > > >> [preview] OpenEJB 4.5.1/TomEE 1.5.1 (staging-132) > >> > > >> http://markmail.org/message/l3rvltbc3az7xu65 > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Binary comparison of this release to previous to help > > with LICENSE > > and > >> > > >> NOTICE file updates: > >> > > >> > >> > > >> 1.0.0 - 1.5.0 > > http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/ppvkyeznaryjluve > >> > > >> > >> > > >> 1.5.0 - 1.5.1 > > http://markmail.org/message/pmwkycgdrz2php6n > >> > > >> > >> > > >> 1.5.1 - 1.6.0 > > http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/xwy56krafcxm3kgs > >> > > >> > >> > > >> And RAT scan: > >> > > >> > >> > > >> - http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d < > >> > > >> http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Also preemptive note, despite that “72 hours” has been > > in all the > > vote > >> > > >> threads, we’ve always left votes open longer to ensure > > everyone has > >> > > time to > >> > > >> give feedback. So I’m hoping the response is not “you > > have 72 > > hours > >> > to > >> > > do > >> > > >> this” as they’ve historically been done by the release > > manager. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Can we consider this a preview release and execute the > > diffs, rat > >> > > reports > >> > > >> and ensure our LICENSE and NOTICE files are up to date? > > Or at the > >> > very > >> > > >> least pause this vote till that stuff is done. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > 6 months ago I would have said yes but since v7 is > 1 > > year old > > think > >> > we > >> > > > got all the time to do all the fancy stuff we want and if > > not done > > in 1 > >> > > > year will likely not be done now so *personally* I don't > > accept any > >> > > excuse > >> > > > anymore to delay a release. > >> > > > >> > > Just an FYI that incorrect LICENSE and NOTICE files is a > > showstopper > > for > >> > > any release and not subject to majority vote. > >> > > > >> > > >> > For a TLP, it definitely is. > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > I’ve had to reroll countless releases because they were wrong, > > hence > >> > > putting effort into those practices. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > -David > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> -- > >> > > >> David Blevins > >> > > >> http://twitter.com/dblevins > >> > > >> http://www.tomitribe.com > >> > > >> > >> > > >>> On May 19, 2016, at 12:45 PM, David Blevins < > > [email protected] > >> > > > >> > > >> wrote: > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> Can you put up a proposed page for the download and > > I can give > >> > feedback > >> > > >> on how it should be updated. Let’s start another > > thread. > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> I’m obviously very time constrained, but happy to > > give you time > > and > >> > > work > >> > > >> openly on it. > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> -- > >> > > >>> David Blevins > >> > > >>> http://twitter.com/dblevins > > <http://twitter.com/dblevins> > >> > > >>> http://www.tomitribe.com > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>>> On May 19, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > < > >> > > [email protected] > >> > > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> @David: > > http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html < > >> > > >> http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html>, > > just added a > >> > > >>>> link on the download page > >> > > http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html.Think > >> > > >> <http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html.Think> the > >> > > >>>> information is there but don't hesitate to > > tune/customize/update > > the > >> > > >>>> website until you are fully happy with it. > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > >> > > >>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau > > < > >> > > >> https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>> | Blog > >> > > >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com < > >> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > >> > > >> > >> > > >> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau < > >> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau>> > >> > > >> | > >> > > >>>> LinkedIn > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau < > >> > > >> https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>> | > > Tomitriber > >> > > >>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com > > <http://www.tomitribe.com/>> | JavaEE > >> > > Factory > >> > > >>>> > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com < > >> > > >> https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com/>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> 2016-05-19 21:03 GMT+02:00 David Blevins > > <[email protected] > >> > > >> <mailto:[email protected]>>: > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>>> Also the download page would need to be > > updated. It currently > > says > >> > > >> “Java > >> > > >>>>> EE 6 compliant” and we would need to remove > > that and replace it > >> > with > >> > > >> “NOT > >> > > >>>>> Java EE 7 compliant”. That text should be a > > link to an > > explanation > >> > > of > >> > > >> why > >> > > >>>>> and an explanation of the version number. > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> -- > >> > > >>>>> David Blevins > >> > > >>>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins > > <http://twitter.com/dblevins> > >> > > >>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> On May 19, 2016, at 11:59 AM, David > > Blevins < > >> > > [email protected]> > >> > > >>>>> wrote: > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> Where is the documentation page again? > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> -- > >> > > >>>>>> David Blevins > >> > > >>>>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins > > <http://twitter.com/dblevins> > >> > > >>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> On May 18, 2016, at 12:39 AM, Romain > > Manni-Bucau < > >> > > >> [email protected] > >> > > >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> > > wrote: > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Hi > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> As mentionned and after the vote > > about the version here is the > >> > > 7.0.0 > >> > > >>>>> vote. > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Here are the release notes: > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051 > >> > > >>>>> < > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051 > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Keys file is still the same: > >> > > https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> As discussed pushed the tag on > > github: > >> > > >>>>>>> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau/tomee/tree/tomee-7.0.0 > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> New staging repository is > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >> > >> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1097 > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Dev dist is > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0 > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Vote will be open for 72h or until > > we get 3 +1 bindings. > > Binding > >> > or > >> > > >> not > >> > > >>>>>>> everyone is very welcomed to test > > and vote. > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Please vote: > >> > > >>>>>>> [ ] +1 yeah it rocks! > >> > > >>>>>>> [ ] +0 dont' know just wanted to > > say hello but no idea what we > >> > are > >> > > >>>>> talking > >> > > >>>>>>> about > >> > > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 no cause ${blocker <- > > X} > >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > >> > > >>>>>>> @rmannibucau > > <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > >> > > >>>>>>> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > >> > > >>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > >> > > >>>>>>> LinkedIn > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | > > Tomitriber > >> > > >>>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | > > JavaEE Factory > >> > > >>>>>>> > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >
