Le 23 mai 2016 23:42, "Jean-Louis Monteiro" <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> a écrit : > > So what is the status regarding the LICENSE and NOTICE?
Nothing patrticular. > Don't want to spend time checking the release if there is still pending > tasks to do. > > We have agreed that the documentation needs to be clear regarding the > status of this release (not Java EE 6 certified nor Java EE 7 certified). > Could we have that download page to be split into something like 2 parts: > 1.x and 7.x > With the information on the policy at the top. > Each section explicitly mentioning which Java EE version are we > implementing, if it is certified and what is complete or not in the TomEE > 7.x > The current version with all the links at the top looks now a bit messy and > the policy on a separate page makes it difficult to find out in my opinion. > Was planning to just keep 1 version by minor for maintained releases + link the version policy. All other versions would go in archives. That is my second task once vote passed. This is however out of vote scope, version policy page work has been done and nobody complained in 5 days so guess it is fine to go then we can enhance it if needed but i dont see it anymore as a blocker - compared to the lack of votes ;). > That seemed to be the agreement of the last vote. > > That said, I spent some time grabbing the sources and trying to compile > without success. > XAPoolTest keeps failing locally when I run it with openejb-core > The code of this vote was green on buildbot when tagged so can likely be something else or envrt dpd. Ping me if you need help. > Alone it works. I'll check that out tomorrow if I can get the test fixed > and more reliable (if possible). > Thanks for taking time to have a look. > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:16 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:40 PM David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 19, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > 2016-05-20 1:23 GMT+02:00 David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > >> Also, we’ve historically done a preview run in advance of an official > > > vote > > > >> for major releases: > > > >> > > > >> [PREVIEW] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1034) > > > >> http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/jjiheacmtd4tb6qw > > > >> > > > >> [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-092) > > > >> http://markmail.org/message/u6ripoz3lsxvcron > > > >> > > > >> 1.0.0 preview binaries > > > >> http://markmail.org/message/f6ix44zeqlcaet3w > > > >> > > > >> [preview] OpenEJB 4.5.1/TomEE 1.5.1 (staging-132) > > > >> http://markmail.org/message/l3rvltbc3az7xu65 > > > >> > > > >> Binary comparison of this release to previous to help with LICENSE and > > > >> NOTICE file updates: > > > >> > > > >> 1.0.0 - 1.5.0 http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/ppvkyeznaryjluve > > > >> > > > >> 1.5.0 - 1.5.1 http://markmail.org/message/pmwkycgdrz2php6n > > > >> > > > >> 1.5.1 - 1.6.0 http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/xwy56krafcxm3kgs > > > >> > > > >> And RAT scan: > > > >> > > > >> - http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d < > > > >> http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d> > > > >> > > > >> Also preemptive note, despite that “72 hours” has been in all the vote > > > >> threads, we’ve always left votes open longer to ensure everyone has > > > time to > > > >> give feedback. So I’m hoping the response is not “you have 72 hours > > to > > > do > > > >> this” as they’ve historically been done by the release manager. > > > >> > > > >> Can we consider this a preview release and execute the diffs, rat > > > reports > > > >> and ensure our LICENSE and NOTICE files are up to date? Or at the > > very > > > >> least pause this vote till that stuff is done. > > > >> > > > >> > > > > 6 months ago I would have said yes but since v7 is > 1 year old think > > we > > > > got all the time to do all the fancy stuff we want and if not done in 1 > > > > year will likely not be done now so *personally* I don't accept any > > > excuse > > > > anymore to delay a release. > > > > > > Just an FYI that incorrect LICENSE and NOTICE files is a showstopper for > > > any release and not subject to majority vote. > > > > > > > For a TLP, it definitely is. > > > > > > > > > > I’ve had to reroll countless releases because they were wrong, hence > > > putting effort into those practices. > > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> David Blevins > > > >> http://twitter.com/dblevins > > > >> http://www.tomitribe.com > > > >> > > > >>> On May 19, 2016, at 12:45 PM, David Blevins < david.blev...@gmail.com > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Can you put up a proposed page for the download and I can give > > feedback > > > >> on how it should be updated. Let’s start another thread. > > > >>> > > > >>> I’m obviously very time constrained, but happy to give you time and > > > work > > > >> openly on it. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> David Blevins > > > >>> http://twitter.com/dblevins <http://twitter.com/dblevins> > > > >>> http://www.tomitribe.com > > > >>> > > > >>>> On May 19, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > >> <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> @David: http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html < > > > >> http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html>, just added a > > > >>>> link on the download page > > > http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html.Think > > > >> <http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html.Think> the > > > >>>> information is there but don't hesitate to tune/customize/update the > > > >>>> website until you are fully happy with it. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > > >>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau < > > > >> https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>> | Blog > > > >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com < > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > > >> > > > >> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau < > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau>> > > > >> | > > > >>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau < > > > >> https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>> | Tomitriber > > > >>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com <http://www.tomitribe.com/>> | JavaEE > > > Factory > > > >>>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com < > > > >> https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com/>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 2016-05-19 21:03 GMT+02:00 David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com > > > >> <mailto:david.blev...@gmail.com>>: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> Also the download page would need to be updated. It currently says > > > >> “Java > > > >>>>> EE 6 compliant” and we would need to remove that and replace it > > with > > > >> “NOT > > > >>>>> Java EE 7 compliant”. That text should be a link to an explanation > > > of > > > >> why > > > >>>>> and an explanation of the version number. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> -- > > > >>>>> David Blevins > > > >>>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins <http://twitter.com/dblevins> > > > >>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> On May 19, 2016, at 11:59 AM, David Blevins < > > > david.blev...@gmail.com> > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Where is the documentation page again? > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>> David Blevins > > > >>>>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins <http://twitter.com/dblevins> > > > >>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On May 18, 2016, at 12:39 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > > >> rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > >>>>> <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Hi > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> As mentionned and after the vote about the version here is the > > > 7.0.0 > > > >>>>> vote. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Here are the release notes: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051 > > > >>>>> < > > > >>>>> > > > >> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051 > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Keys file is still the same: > > > https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> As discussed pushed the tag on github: > > > >>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau/tomee/tree/tomee-7.0.0 > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> New staging repository is > > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1097 > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Dev dist is https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0 > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Binding > > or > > > >> not > > > >>>>>>> everyone is very welcomed to test and vote. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Please vote: > > > >>>>>>> [ ] +1 yeah it rocks! > > > >>>>>>> [ ] +0 dont' know just wanted to say hello but no idea what we > > are > > > >>>>> talking > > > >>>>>>> about > > > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 no cause ${blocker <- X} > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > > >>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > > >>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > > >>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > > >>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > > > >>>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > > > >>>>>>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > >
