Hi folks! Sorry for the delay! Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now. Will ping back once I know more.
txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/ > (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository > system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> > > 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi Romain, >> >> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing? >> >> Best regards, >> Alexandre >> >> >> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >>> Hi Alex, >>> >>> you can set as system property (through surefire) >>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the >>> repo> >>> >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ >> rmannibucau> | >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>> >>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Hi Romain, >>>> >>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my Arquilian >>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml: >>>> >>>> <repositories> >>>> <repository> >>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id> >>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name> >>>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/ >>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url> >>>> </repository> >>>> </repositories> >>>> >>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1) >>>> >>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the >>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+ version >>>> which isn't yet officialized? >>>> >>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above repository >>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on: >>>> <dependency> >>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId> >>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-embedded</artifactId> >>>> <version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current version --> >>>> </dependency> >>>> >>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented somewhere on >>>> tomee.apache.org?) >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Alexandre >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/ >>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ >>>> rmannibucau> | >>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>> >>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check the >>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services (annotations >>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore in TomEE >>>>>> + 7.x). >>>>>> >>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4, but it's >>>>>> not being resolved: >>>>>> <dependency> >>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId> >>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee- >> embedded</artifactId> >>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current version --> >>>>>> </dependency> >>>>>> >>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized. >>>>>> >>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the current >>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give >> feedback >>>>>> on this RC before it's final. >>>>>> >>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to run my >>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate, *using >> the >>>>>> embedded adapter* ? >>>>>> >>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded is an >>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version). >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>> Hello Andy, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1 >> based on >>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+ >> 7.0.4 >>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <andy...@gmx.de>: >>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+ >> binding >>>>>> votes. >>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the >>>> moment, >>>>>> so I >>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and >> checking >>>>>> them >>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and testing >>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This always >>>> takes >>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your >> help >>>> and >>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested >> all >>>>>> your >>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello Andy >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4 >> is >>>>>>>>> supposed to last? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>> Alex >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fkjae...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht < >>>> agumbre...@tomitribe.com>: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and >>>> place >>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, >>>> which is >>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo: >>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Source zip: >>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache >>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee- >>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Dist area: >>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/ >>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Legal: >>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to >>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Keys: >>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Changelog: >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje >>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot: >>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu- >> jvm8/builds/725 >>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please vote: >>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release >>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here: >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as >> much >>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding >> (At >>>>>> least 3 >>>>>>>>>>> binding votes). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. >> Thank >>>> you >>>>>>>>>>> very >>>>>>>>>>> much for your time. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>
