Yep It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib folder - fop is not particular since xalan is very common
Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead" <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> a écrit : > with 7.0.4 i am getting this > java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMManagerDefault > cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager > at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.newInstance(DTMManager.java:137) > at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:102) > at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:349) > at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:337) > at org.apache.xalan.transformer.TransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor > merImpl.java:397) > at org.apache.xalan.templates.StylesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty > lesheetRoot.java:200) > > with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp. Romain said it > was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include apache fop in one of > my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to TomEE stack > > On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: > >> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far! >> >> Jon >> >> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead < >> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote: >> >> Hi Jon, >>> >>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my development setup. So >>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am running it on my >>> local machine in place of 7.0.3. >>> >>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just keep working >>> and report back if there are any issues >>> >>> Matthew >>> >>> >>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>>> >>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its those >>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots won't be >>>> deployed here (they'll go to here: >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I believe). I >>>> think >>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so if you're >>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one manually. >>>> >>>> Jon >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead < >>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote: >>>> >>>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >>>> >>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi folks! >>>>> >>>>>> Sorry for the delay! >>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now. >>>>>> Will ping back once I know more. >>>>>> >>>>>> txs and LieGrue, >>>>>> strub >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>> >>>>>> : >>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/ >>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository >>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Romain, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Alex, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire) >>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the >>>>>>>>> repo> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Romain, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my Arquilian >>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <repositories> >>>>>>>>>> <repository> >>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id> >>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name> >>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/ >>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url> >>>>>>>>>> </repository> >>>>>>>>>> </repositories> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the >>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+ version >>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above repository >>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on: >>>>>>>>>> <dependency> >>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId> >>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e >>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId> >>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current version >>>>>>>>>> --> >>>>>>>>>> </dependency> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented somewhere >>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/ >>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> >: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services >>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations >>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore in >>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE >>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x). >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4, but >>>>>>>>>>>> it's >>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved: >>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency> >>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId> >>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current >>>>>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> --> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> </dependency> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the >>>>>>>>>>>> current >>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> feedback >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final. >>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to run >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate, >>>>>>>>>>>> *using >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ? >>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded is >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version). >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker < >>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> based on >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <andy...@gmx.de>: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> votes. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> moment, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> so I >>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and >>>>>>>>>> testing >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This >>>>>>>>>>>>>> always >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution. >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> help >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fkjae...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbre...@tomitribe.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please vote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> (At >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> very >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> much for your time. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
