Hi That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its those binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots won't be deployed here (they'll go to here: https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I believe). I think there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so if you're waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one manually.
Jon On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead < matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote: > are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/ > dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/? > > > On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote: > >> Hi folks! >> >> Sorry for the delay! >> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now. >> Will ping back once I know more. >> >> txs and LieGrue, >> strub >> >> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com >>> >: >>> >>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/ >>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository >>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot >>> >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>> >>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> Hi Romain, >>>> >>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing? >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Alexandre >>>> >>>> >>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> Hi Alex, >>>>> >>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire) >>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the >>>>> repo> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ >>>>> >>>> rmannibucau> | >>>> >>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>> >>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Romain, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my Arquilian >>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml: >>>>>> >>>>>> <repositories> >>>>>> <repository> >>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id> >>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name> >>>>>> <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/ >>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url> >>>>>> </repository> >>>>>> </repositories> >>>>>> >>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1) >>>>>> >>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the >>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+ version >>>>>> which isn't yet officialized? >>>>>> >>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above repository >>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on: >>>>>> <dependency> >>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId> >>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e >>>>>> mbedded</artifactId> >>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current version --> >>>>>> </dependency> >>>>>> >>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented somewhere on >>>>>> tomee.apache.org?) >>>>>> >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>> >: >>>>>> >>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/ >>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>>> rmannibucau> | >>>>>> >>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to check the >>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services (annotations >>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore in >>>>>>>> TomEE >>>>>>>> + 7.x). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4, but it's >>>>>>>> not being resolved: >>>>>>>> <dependency> >>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId> >>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> embedded</artifactId> >>>> >>>>> <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current version --> >>>>>>>> </dependency> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet officialized. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the current >>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to give >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> feedback >>>> >>>>> on this RC before it's final. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order to run >>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate, *using >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> the >>>> >>>>> embedded adapter* ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I downloaded is >>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello Andy, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a +1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> based on >>>> >>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this TomEE+ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 7.0.4 >>>> >>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <andy...@gmx.de>: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get 3+ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> binding >>>> >>>>> votes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at the >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> moment, >>>>>> >>>>>>> so I >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> checking >>>> >>>>> them >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and testing >>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This always >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> takes >>>>>> >>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate your >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> help >>>> >>>>> and >>>>>> >>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly tested >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> all >>>> >>>>> your >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+ 7.0.4 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> is >>>> >>>>> supposed to last? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Alex >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fkjae...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht < >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> agumbre...@tomitribe.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this build and >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>> >>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 (Provided). >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java 9, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> which is >>>>>> >>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected) flag: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Source zip: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache >>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee- >>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Legal: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to >>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje >>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu- >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725 >>>> >>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release >>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - Include as >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> much >>>> >>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit test. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (At >>>> >>>>> least 3 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> binding votes). >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank >>>> >>>>> you >>>>>> >>>>>>> very >>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >
