No, you see this stack cause the test cant be loaded but it is in several classes of taglib project, XalanUtil and a few others.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-21 11:14 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk>: > so do i need to replace it with something else? is that inside > ReflectionUtils? > > > On 21/11/2017 11:08, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> >> That's the one, org.apache.xpath is provided by xalan (don't ask me >> why xalan is not in the name ;)) >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn >> >> >> 2017-11-21 10:57 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead >> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk>: >>> >>> mvn install outputs this: >>> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.SurefireReflectionException: >>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; nested exception is >>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException: null >>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException >>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) >>> at >>> >>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) >>> at >>> >>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) >>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) >>> at >>> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189) >>> at >>> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165) >>> at >>> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85) >>> at >>> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:103) >>> at >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74) >>> Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/xpath/VariableStack >>> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method) >>> at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2701) >>> at java.lang.Class.privateGetMethodRecursive(Class.java:3048) >>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod0(Class.java:3018) >>> at java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:1784) >>> at >>> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.tryGetMethod(ReflectionUtils.java:57) >>> at >>> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isSuiteOnly(JUnit3TestChecker.java:64) >>> at >>> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isValidJUnit3Test(JUnit3TestChecker.java:59) >>> at >>> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.accept(JUnit3TestChecker.java:54) >>> at >>> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit4.JUnit4TestChecker.accept(JUnit4TestChecker.java:51) >>> at >>> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.DefaultDirectoryScanner.locateTestClasses(DefaultDirectoryScanner.java:84) >>> at >>> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.scanClassPath(JUnit4Provider.java:186) >>> at >>> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:93) >>> ... 9 more >>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: >>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack >>> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381) >>> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424) >>> at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:335) >>> at java.lang >>> >>> >>> On 21/11/2017 10:53, Matthew Broadhead wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Romain, >>>> >>>> the dependency is listed in each pom.xml in >>>> - compat >>>> - impl >>>> - jstlel >>>> - standard-test >>>> it is listed as provided in all of them except standard-test. >>>> >>>> would i just remove all references and then do a mvn install to check >>>> the >>>> output? >>>> >>>> Matthew >>>> >>>> On 21/11/2017 10:38, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Matthew, >>>>> >>>>> if you checkout >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk and >>>>> drop xalan dependency you should be on track. You can have a look to >>>>> XalanUtil class but the xalan dependency is mainly here for XPath >>>>> usage IIRC. There are some replacements in the JRE so it should be the >>>>> way to go I think. >>>>> >>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead >>>>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk>: >>>>>> >>>>>> hi rmannibucau, >>>>>> i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to continue >>>>>> after >>>>>> a >>>>>> busy period. >>>>>> what do you mean about moving up the svn tree? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 11/10/2017 09:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the svn tree >>>>>>> IIRC >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead" >>>>>>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> >>>>>>> a écrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can be >>>>>>>> ignored? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.' -e 'xalan' >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45: >>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"; >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52: >>>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/> >>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib >>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan=" >>>>>>>> http://xml.apache.org/xslt"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2 >>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"; >>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee >>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"; >>>>>>>> version="2.0"> >>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45: >>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache >>>>>>>> .org/xslt" >>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52: xalan:indent-amount="2"/> >>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - xalan >>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib >>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"; >>>>>>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2 >>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"; >>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee >>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"; >>>>>>>> version="2.0"> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: >>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - >>>>>>>> xalan >>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: >>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>>>>>>> Binary file >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz >>>>>>>> matches >>>>>>>> Binary file >>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip >>>>>>>> matches >>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: >>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>> xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: >>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1- >>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan >>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>>>>>>> Binary file >>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1- >>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches >>>>>>>> Binary file >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war >>>>>>>> matches >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: >>>>>>>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462 >>>>>>>> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93: >>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94: >>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95: >>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96: >>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21: >>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99: >>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100: >>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36: >>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47: >>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100: >>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101: >>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>>>>>>> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be optional >>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>> maven-bundle-plugin >>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21: >>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan] >>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar >>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar >>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93: <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead" >>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.u >>>>>>>>> k> >>>>>>>>> a écrit : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove all >>>>>>>>> xalan >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> refs? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead < >>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead" >>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.u >>>>>>>>>>>>> k> >>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other >>>>>>>>>>>>> versions >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib >>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.u >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gerDefault >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stack >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documented >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> services >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy...@gmx.de >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjae...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbre...@tomitribe.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.3.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (corrected) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consensus >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
